detail
Newsweek’s history of selling advertising packages to the American
Petroleum Institute (API) in exchange for the right for co-host “public
policy forums” with API President Jack Gerard. This controversy follows
in the wake of
that
Newsweek’s sister publication, The Washington Post, organized
top-dollar “salons” between corporate lobbyists, top government
officials, and Post staff.
In Radford’s letter, he demands that Newsweek disclose the total
amount of advertising revenue they have received from API this year and
how much money the company has made in return for organizing the
forums. He also urges Newsweek help provide some balance on their panel
by including a leading clean energy advocate such as Carl Pope of the
Sierra Club, an independent climate expert such as NASA scientist Jim
Hansen, and a prominent spokesperson for the countries most vulnerable
to unchecked climate change like President Mohamed Nasheed of the
Republic of Maldives.
Newsweek asserts there is a separation between the advertising
revenue it has been paid by API and its news operation. However, the
forum will be held on December 1st, “moderated” by Newsweek columnist
Howard Fineman, part of the magazine’s news division.
The full text of Radford’s letter is below.
---
Mr. Jon Meacham
Editor, Newsweek
395 Hudson St.
New York, NY 10014
Dear Mr. Meacham:
Yesterday,
Talking Points Memo, The New York Times and Environment and Energy
Publishing reported on Newsweek’s disturbing practice of selling its
name and the participation of a top commentator to industry lobbyists.
These include five “energy policy” forums, and another upcoming forum
on December 1st. I was recently forwarded the attached invitation from
Newsweek External Relations Manager Jennifer Slattery to attend that
forum entitled, “Climate and Energy Policy: Moving?” This panel is
strategically planned exactly one week before the crucial global
climate negotiations in Copenhagen.
At present, the panel’s only member is American Petroleum Institute (API) President Jack Gerard.
As
you know, Mr. Gerard is the nation’s top registered lobbyist for Big
Oil. API and its biggest member, ExxonMobil, have aggressively lobbied
against global warming policy solutions that will inevitably limit
global consumption of oil. API and its members have spent tens of
millions of dollars over the past decade alone on propaganda efforts
and front groups to undercut public confidence in the wide and deep
global scientific consensus that global warming is real, that human
consumption of fossil fuels is driving it, and that the problem is a
serious threat to America and the rest of the world.
Mr. Gerard’s outlier activities put him on the opposite side of the
world scientific consensus formed of thousands of scientists on the
Nobel Prize- winning Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. That
consensus has been recognized by California Governor Arnold
Schwarzenegger, Senator John McCain, retired military leaders such as
General Anthony Zinni, and the heads of major corporations.
It’s clearly not my place to tell you how to run your news
organization. However, as one of your readers, I want to save you the
extended embarrassment experienced by Newsweek’s sister publication,
The Washington Post, when it considered “salons” that would have given
polluting industry lobbyists access to top Post news staff. That story
was an example of the conflicts that can arise when a news publication
sells its name to those lobbying for influence through public relations
opportunities.
I hope you’ll consider that it is not a good idea for news
organizations, however financially troubled in this recession, to
sponsor public relations functions with the lobbyist for the world’s
most powerful polluting industry.
To restore some credibility to this upcoming forum, I request that
Newsweek and The Washington Post Company take the following steps:
1. First, disclose the total amount of advertising revenue the company
has received from the American Petroleum Institute and its member
companies in 2009.
2. Second, disclose the specific amount of money Newsweek has made
by selling its name for use in these “public policy forums.”
3. Third, balance the panel to avoid the appearance of pay-to-play propaganda by expanding it to include:
* Sierra Club Executive Director Carl Pope, or the head of another environmental group working to address global warming
* An independent scientist such as top NASA climate scientist Jim Hansen
* Republic of Maldives President Mohamed Nasheed, who is preparing to
move his entire nation due to rising sea waters and acidified seas.
At the risk of being presumptuous, we have already begun contacting
each of these three men to see if they would consider participating in
your forum at Newsweek’s expense.
These people would balance the panel by:
* Pairing Mr. Gerard, a top lobbyist and propaganda funder
working against solving the global warming, with an advocate who is
promoting solutions to the problem.
* Providing a top
international scientific expert on the impacts and urgency of global
warming, who has nothing financially to gain from his viewpoint.
* Adding the benefit of a leader who is engaged in the global
treaty negotiations and president of a nation that will likely cease to
exist because of the burning of the product produced by Mr. Gerard’s
industry.
Especially given the stakes for humanity, I hope you will use this
forum as an opportunity to discuss the best way to move our nation to a
clean energy economy. A broad array of national security experts have
identified global warming as one of the national greatest security
threats of the 21st century. For the rest of the world, the urgency is
just as great: The new report by
Save the Children predicts that 250,000 children will die next year from the severe impacts of global climate change.
Considering that last fact alone during the panel should make for a
much more interesting conversation with Mr. Gerard before members of
Congress.
We look forward to your prompt response to this
letter. I want to assist Newsweek in balancing this event to avoid
further damage to Newsweek’s reputation, and to ensure public is better
informed about the urgency of addressing this problem in accordance
with the wide and deep scientific consensus that already exists.
Regards,
Phil Radford
###