The winds of change are blowing through the United States, starting in Massachusetts. For too long, acid rain has showered your shores and beaches, and residents of the Cape and Islands have inhaled toxic air from dirty power plants.
The people of Massachusetts know first hand the drastic effects of an
oil spill – the 100,000-gallon spill in Buzzard’s Bay in 2003 soiled
coastlines, closed shellfish beds, and killed nesting shore birds and
seals. And we are all feeling the pain of our country’s reliance
on foreign oil. Cape Wind will be an important step toward
putting all that to an end, and that is why Greenpeace strongly
supports offshore wind for Cape Cod.
For thirty years, Greenpeace has worked to protect the world’s
oceans. We successfully campaigned to end dumping of radioactive
and industrial wastes at sea, helped create a moratorium on commercial
whaling, and have played a crucial role in the development of other
laws and policies that safeguard our oceans. By supporting offshore
wind for Cape Cod, residents of the Cape and Islands have the
opportunity to join Greenpeace and dozens of other environmental groups
in defending the Cape’s beaches and marine life from the dangerous
impacts of dirty energy.
The Cape Wind project is undergoing a comprehensive and thorough review
process that looks at all aspects of the proposal. A draft
environmental impact statement was released late 2004: two years
in the making and over 4,000 pages long, initial analysis found that
the environmental, public health, and economic benefits of Cape Wind
far exceed any minor short-term environmental costs that may be
associated with the project. Let me say unequivocally that if
Greenpeace had any concerns that this project would have long-term
consequences for the marine ecosystem of Nantucket Sound, we would be
the first to oppose it. We have opposed wind farms both on and
offshore in the past, and we will continue to do so when projects are
ill sited or improper in size and scope. Cape Wind, however, is
the right project, in the right place, at the right time.
Unlike opponents of Cape Wind, Greenpeace has first hand experience
with offshore wind. In the United Kingdom, where Greenpeace
worked to develop the country’s first offshore wind farms, initial
fears that the projects would lower property values, decrease tourism,
or harm the environment were completely unfounded. In fact,
because of broad public support, the UK now plans to build additional
offshore wind farms that will supply 1 in 6 UK households with energy
from this clean renewable resource. Europe is proof of the benefits
created by offshore wind; now that opportunity is coming to
Massachusetts.
The wind farm proposed for Nantucket Sound will provide 75 percent of
the Cape and Island’s energy without emitting asthma-causing pollution,
spilling oil in the water, or producing any of the greenhouse gasses
that cause global warming. In addition to protecting the environment,
the wind farm will benefit the Cape’s economy by creating jobs and
attracting tourists.
The opponents of Cape Wind would have you believe that to protect the
environment, we need to oppose the wind farm. In fact, the
opposite is true. Global warming poses significant risks for the Cape
and Islands. From more frequent and severe red tides to rising
sea levels and more intense storms, a warming planet is a big problem
for the same beachfront homeowners who oppose Cape Wind. The
environment that is so important to the way of life on Cape Cod is in
jeopardy, and projects like Cape Wind are the solution.
John Passacantando
Executive Director, Greenpeace USA