Feature story - May 17, 2003
Based on industry reports to the EPA, there are more than 30 cities in 25 states that contain the 112 chemical facilities that threaten one million or more workers and local residents in the event of a toxic release due to a terrorist attack or accidental release. A U.S. Army's Surgeon General report estimated that more than two million people could be killed or injured in a terrorist attack on a U.S. chemical plant.
Find
out if YOU live in a vulnerability zone near a chemical
plant.
The good news is that there were 123 of these "worst of the
worst" facilities only two years ago. For example, one of these,
the Blue Plains sewage treatment plant in Washington, D.C., was
removed from the list because it switched from chlorine to safer
substances. The sewage treatment plant accelerated by one year an
end to their use of highly toxic chlorine gas due to its potential
use by terrorists. The plant is only four miles from the U.S.
Capitol. According to the National Transportation Safety Board and
the Coast Guard, a large leak of chlorine gas can travel two miles
in only 10 minutes and remain acutely toxic to a distance of about
20 miles.
Greenpeace recommends a set of short and long-term steps to
truly eliminate these unnecessary and preventable disasters. In the
short-term these include the immediate: adoption of S. 157 by
Congress, implementation of a program to end the transport of large
quantities of poisonous chemicals, reduction in storage of similar
substances to quantities that cannot threaten area populations, and
decentralized production of these substances to eliminate the need
for large container transport and storage.
In the long-term, virtually all of the ultra-hazardous chemicals
used in the U.S. have safer substitutes and conversion to them
should begin today. The U.S. needs many things to function, but
what it does not need is to continue producing obsolete and
ultra-hazardous chemicals that pose enormous risks to the
public-with or without the threat of terrorist attack.
Unfortunately, the chemical industry is furiously lobbying
Congress to avoid even moderate regulations that could help prevent
these disasters before they happen. Furthermore, even though the
Bush Administration touts security among its top priorities after
September 11th, it refuses to impose new requirements on the
chemical industry to reduce and eliminate these threats.
On November 17, 2003, Greenpeace provided the White House with a
list of the 112 facilities that threaten one million or more
people. This list accompanied a letter to
President Bush, charging his administration with two years of
neglect on this crucial homeland security issue, and calling for a
series of measures to diminish and eliminate these threats.
The 112 Facilites Can be Found in the Following
States:
Arizona - 1
California - 15
Colorado - 1
Delaware - 1
Florida - 3
Illinois - 15
Indiana - 2
Louisiana - 1
Maryland - 4
Massachusetts - 1
Michigan - 5
Minnesota - 5
Nevada - 1
New Hampshire - 1
New Jersey - 7
New York - 8
Ohio - 12
Pennsylvania - 5
Rhode Island - 1
Tennessee - 1
Texas - 18
Utah - 1
Washington - 1
Wisconsin - 1
More Than 30 Cities with One Million or More People
Threatened
- Akron, Ohio
- Baltimore, Maryland *
- Boston, Massachusetts
- Chicago, Illinois *
- Cincinnati, Ohio
- Cleveland, Ohio *
- Dallas, Texas
- Dayton, Ohio
- Denver, Colorado
- Detroit, Michigan *
- Houston, Texas *
- Las Vegas, Nevada
- Los Angeles, California *
- Manchester, New Hampshire
- Memphis, Tennessee
- Miami, Florida
- Milwaukee, Wisconsin
- Minneapolis/St. Paul, Minnesota *
- New Jersey (Northeastern) *
- New Orleans, Louisiana
- New York, New York
- Niagara Falls/Buffalo, New York *
- Philadelphia, Pennsylvania *
- Phoenix, Arizona
- Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
- Providence, Rhode Island
- Salt Lake City, Utah
- San Francisco, California
- St. Louis, Missouri*
- Tacoma/Seattle, Washington
* Cities with multiple facilities
The sources for the map and cities listing are:
- U.S. EPA's reading rooms
- New York Daily News
- Philadelphia Inquirer
- Working Group on Community Right-to-Know