Feature story - May 19, 2003
There are over 100 reactors currently operating in the United States, many of which are located close to major population centers such as New York City and Philadelphia. Each nuclear reactor has the potential to devastate the region in which it operates.
The potential for such devastation lies in the radioactive fuel
that fires the nuclear power plant. The radioactive fuel rods,
whether inside the reactor or in the spent fuel pool, must be
cooled to prevent them from melting down. If a meltdown were to
occur either in the reactor or in the spent fuel pool, the accident
could kill and injure tens of thousands of people, leaving large
regions uninhabitable.
In the wake of the accident at Chernobyl in Ukraine, the U.S.
Nuclear Regulatory Commission was asked to testify before Congress
concerning the potential for severe accident at a U.S. reactor. The
NRC acknowledged that there was a 45% chance of a meltdown in the
next 20 years. NRC Commissioner James Asselstine stated that:
While we hope that their occurrence is unlikely, there
are accident sequences for U.S. plants that can lead to rupture or
bypassing of containment in U.S. reactors which would result in the
off-site release of fission products comparable or worse than the
releases estimated by the NRC staff to have taken place during the
Chernobyl accident.
This is why the Commission told Congress recently that it could
not rule out a commercial nuclear power plant accident in the
United States resulting in tens of billions of dollars of property
losses and injuries to the public.
In 1990, the Wall Street Journal
reported on a study conducted by a Soviet nuclear industry
economist on the continuing economic disaster of the Chernobyl
accident. The study found that the cost of the disaster had
originally been underestimated, the accident may cost 20 times more
than Moscow's original estimates. The accident contaminated
approximately 12,400 square miles. The Wall Street Journal article
concluded that, "The total bill suggests that the Soviet Union may
have been better off if they had never begun building nuclear
reactors in the first place."