Feature story - February 25, 2008
UPDATE: The House Security Committee passes a chemical plant anti-terrorism bill. The bill would significantly strengthen the Department of Homeland Security's (DHS) regulations and create a permanent law to address the risks posed by chemical facilities. The bill will next go to the Energy and Commerce Committee.
Chemical plants use or produce ingredients in everyday products
like household cleaners, plastics, paper and materials for
purifying water. Some of these plants use large quantities of
poison gases that pose a deadly threat to workers and communities.
But virtually all of these plants could use safer alternative
processes or chemicals.
There are approximately 100
chemical facilities in major U.S. cities where a terrorist
attack or major accident would put one million or more people at
risk. But, whether it's one, a thousand or one million people who
are in danger, the time is now for Congress to step up and enact
strong legislation to protect all of us.
One of the most dangerous chemicals is chlorine. Chlorine
typically is used as a disinfectant or purifier, and as an
ingredient in plastics and other products. While routinely
transported in liquid form, it can turn into a deadly toxic gas
when exposed to air.
Despite this, security at chemical plants is fatally flawed. And
a new interim law actually prohibits the federal government from
requiring the use of safer more secure chemicals that could
eliminate these risks at a minimal cost.
Congress is now considering legislation that could protect the
hundreds of communities now at risk.
But if Congress is serious about protecting the millions of
Americans now at risk they must pass legislation that prevents a
disaster before it happens and reject the chemical industry
lobbyists.
Greenpeace and a coalition of labor and other environmental
groups are using their expertise with these dangerous chemicals to
propose prevention oriented legislation that will protect us even
in the event of a successful terrorist attack on a chemical plant.
To achieve this they are urging Congress and the President to
support security standards that include:
- Requiring all covered chemical plants to assess safer
technologies that will eliminate the potential consequences of an
attack on a chemical plant;
- Requiring "high-risk" facilities to implement safer
technologies or chemicals;
- Ensuring that the 3,400 to 4,400 facilities that the Department
of Homeland Security (DHS) identified as the most dangerous (they
pose a risk to 1,000 or more people) are included in the "high risk
tier," giving them stronger oversight and regulations;
- Eliminate the risks posed by the use of chlorine gas at
approximately water treatment plants now exempt from the current
law by utilizing safer alternatives;
- Expediting deadlines for DHS to require and approve site
security plans;
- Requiring meaningful involvement of plant employees in
developing security plans;
- Including whistle blower protections to enhance
enforcement;
- Providing basic information to the public on facility
compliance or non-compliance with the law;
- Ensuring the right of all states to establish stronger security
standards, and
- Enhancing enforcement by allowing citizen suits.
And exclude:
- Special interest loopholes that allow chemical plants to avoid
using safer technologies.
Chemical plant legislation and safety regulations are needed to
protect hundreds of communities and thousands of workers now at
risk. Nearly seven years after the 9/11 attacks it is long past
time to put the security of our nation ahead of special interests
or politics. Now is the time to put those at risk first.