Toxic Chemicals
In this test, high levels of toxic chemicals in electronics products
means more than a failing grade for the company, it represents serious
health and environmental hazards to children in the developing world
who take these products apart for scraps. Toxic ingredients like
polyvinyl chloride (PVC) plastic and brominated flame retardants (BFRs)
don’t improve the quality of electronic performance, but exposure to
them can cause a series of health threats throughout the life cycle of
the product.
Recycling and Take Back Programs
The growing popularity of electronic technology and changing trends
have resulted in massive quantities of discarded products that often
end up in scrap yards in the developing world. We graded the leading
technology companies on their policies for taking back and reusing or
recycling their own-brand discarded products.
So who was at the head of the class and who failed?
While none of these companies passed our test with flying colors, Nokia
and Dell lead the pack with positive steps toward eliminating toxics
and implementing take back programs. Apple isn’t charming any teachers
these days. With a bushel of toxic chemicals and a poor recycling
program, the company received a failing grade. Acer, Motorola, and
Lenovo flunked the test entirely.
- Nokia
- Dell
- HP
- Sony Ericsson
- Samsung
- Sony
- LG Electronics
- Panasonic
- Toshiba
- Fujitsu Siemens Computers
- Apple
- Acer
- Motorola
- Lenovo
See the Test Results
A Formula for Success
Every quarter, we’ll release a new report card to keep these companies
on their toes. To graduate from our school of environmentally-friendly
electronics, the requirements are simple really:
- Set a clear timeline to remove all toxic chemicals from electronic production and products.
- Develop a clear take back policy and recycling program.
Do your homework
Download the full report card to see how your favorite gadgets scored.