Greenpeace Confronts DBT with Desi Aaloos: Need to Assess GM Potatoes Acknowledged

Press release - September 2, 2003
NEW DELHI, India — Greenpeace activists surprised Dr. Manju Sharma, Secretary of the Department of Bio-Technology (DBT) with a house-call this morning, bearing baskets of indigenous potatoes and a banner stating “ GM potatoes no solution to malnutrition.” Dr. Sharma refused to accept the 100 kgs of desi (local) kufri variety of potatoes but did commit to follow the stipulated procedures for bio-safety assessments before the GM potato is considered for approval.

Greenpeace has been questioning the need to develop risk-laden Genetically Modified (GM) -variety of potato to "meet the protein requirements of school-children," (as Dr. Sharma had claimed) when existing indigenous potatoes varieties like the kufri have far higher levels of protein, as do other traditional sources of protein such as pulses, soya etc. Dr. Sharma has been publicly promoting the GM Potato, proposing that it be served as part of the mid-day meal scheme to school children, allegedly to solve the problem of their malnutrition. But as Greenpeace activists pointed out, GM Potato contains only 1.6% protein, while Indian potato varieties contain between 2.0 & 2.6 % protein (almost 100% more than the GM Potato!) Other foods such as Wheat, Rice, Maize and Soya bean contain far more protein and other nutrients.

"We brought these potatoes to Dr. Sharma's doorstep to make it evident to her that malnutrition exists due to mismanaged distribution and lack of purchasing power, not because of inadequate quantities produced. Protein-rich foods have existed for years and yet our children are undernourished. What is even more outrageous is that the scientist responsible for cultivating the GM potato, Prof. Asis Datta, is also a member of the DBT, which means this expedited approval process smacks of nepotism besides scientifically unsound practice," says Divya Raghunandan, GE Campaigner, Greenpeace India. "They've been hoping to force-feed us GM potatoes, and we are here to exercise our Right to say NO to GMOs."

Greenpeace is also questioning the lack of transparency surrounding the approval process. "According to bio-safety regulations, every GM crop must undergo small scale field trials conducted by the Review Committee on Genetic Modification, after which, if successful, it shall undergo large scale field trials before the GEAC even considers approval," says Divya Raghunandan, "Dr. Sharma's previous statement was that the GM Potato would be marketed in six months, indicating that they had not taken into account the time GEAC requires to complete its bio-safety assessments. Now she has assured the media that they will follow due process, and that field trial data will be made public. We will wait for her to make good on these promises."

For more information:Divya Raghunandan, GE Campaigner - 9845535406

Email id:

For more information:Namrata Chowdhary, Media Officer - 9810850092

Email id: