NASA adjustment - still plenty hot

Talk about missing the point!

McIntyre has been trying for years to get climate scientists to release their proprietary algorithms that...

Talk about missing the point!

McIntyre has been trying for years to get climate scientists to release their proprietary algorithms that are used to determine adjustments in surface station data, tree ring proxies, ice core sampling, etc. with little to no luck. When they deign to reply, it's usually some form of "trust us, we know what we're doing."

Now he's found a .15 degree C error that exceeds the amount of temperature reduction (0.07 degree C) the Kyoto Protocol would achieve by 2050! AGW proponents should be screaming for a Global Climate Audit. but they're not.

I don't believe the AGW warmmongers, but if it turns out in years to come I was wrong, my conscience will be clear. Climate scientists could have opted for total transparency in their methods years ago, but for whatever reasons they prefer to keep their little secrets. The Hansen Y2K error shows I'm correct to not trust them at all.

Actually, the point is that the climate is heating up and we need to do something about it. (See graph above.)
So there was a small error in the...

Actually, the point is that the climate is heating up and we need to do something about it. (See graph above.)
So there was a small error in the data for North America. Looking at the global data it is obvious even to a non-expert like myself that our world is heating up. And in fact the vast vast preponderance of (actual) experts agree with this view.
NASA made a small correction to its figures. Good. That's how science works. But I don't think people like McIntyre are interested in genuine scientific investigation. They put far too much effort into exaggerating the significance of things like this.
And I don't think much of your conspiracy theory that there is some sort of secrecy surrounding climate work. It sounds wako on the face of it.