Poor countries neglected in financial bail-outs

Financial crisis threatens human rights and gains made fighting poverty and climate change in poor countries

Feature story - 17 October, 2008
The urgency shown by rich countries to tackle the financial meltdown stands in stark contrast to their foot-dragging and broken promises over aid and poverty alleviation, human rights and climate change.

A child in a forest dependent community in the Democratic Republic of Congo

The statement below was signed by the heads of six international NGOs: 

  • Gerd Leipold, International Executive Director, Greenpeace
  • Irene Khan, Secretary General, Amnesty International 
  • Jeremy Hobbs, Executive Director, Oxfam International
  • Dr. Dean Hirsch, Chief Executive Officer, World Vision International
  • Tom Miller, Chief Executive Officer, PLAN International
  • Dr. Robert Glasser, Secretary General, CARE International

Last week the USgovernment provided another bail-out of $37.8 billion to the giant insurancecompany, AIG, bringing the total of rescue loans to that one company in thelast two weeks to nearly $123 billion. This is $18 billion more than the annual amount of aid to poor countries and twice thatneeded to achieve the internationally-agreed Millennium Development Goals. In Europe the bail-outs have continued. The UK government has thrown in a further 50billion to recapitalise the UKbanking sector - which is roughly what's needed for poor countries to adapt toclimate change each year.

The urgency shown by rich countries to tackle the financial meltdown standsin stark contrast to their foot-dragging and broken promises over aid andpoverty alleviation, human rights and climate change.

It is too soon yet to predict exactly how badly the poorest countries willfare in the financial crisis and resultant economic downturn. But it is clearthat reduced demands for exports to developed countries and lower foreigninvestment will mean less growth and government revenue for already-fragilesocial protection and services.

For millions of the world's poorest citizens, it is literally a matterof life and death. In many countries social safety nets were dismantled underpressure from international financial institutions, leaving the vulnerableunprotected. In late September, while Wall Street was reeling from its financialfailures in the glare of publicity, a meeting organized by the United Nations inanother part of Manhattan revealed that very few governments will meet thetargets set by the Millenium Development Goals to reduce poverty by 2015, andthat rising food and energy prices have wiped away much of the progress made sofar.

The human rights prognosis is not good. Not only are economic and socialrights - including the right to housing, health and education - coming underincreased pressure, there is a risk of more human rights violations.  As the economy shrinks and countries tightentheir belts, migrants and refugees could be pushed back to untenablesituations. Social tensions could increase, leading nervous governments toclamp down on dissent and impose tough public security policies, curbing civilliberties. Already fragile states could be further weakened by the currentcrisis and slide back into instability and violence.

Worse could follow if rich countries decide to use the financial crisis asan excuse to cut aid and trade. History gives us cause for concern. During the1972/3 recession, global aid spending fell by 15% to just $28.8 billion. In1990/3, aid donors slashed their spending by 25% over a five-year period to $46billion, and aid did not return to 1992 levels until 2003. Humanitarian aid -what we spend to help people hit by natural disasters and conflict - also fell sharplyand over a similar time as a direct result of the 1990-3 recession (only theyears of the Rwandaand Kosovo conflicts bucked that trend). In terms of trade, for instance, countriesreacted to the 1929 Wall Streetcrash and global depression by erecting tariff barriers and world trade fell bytwo-thirds.

A replay ofthat in 2009 would be a disaster for poor exporting countries.Reduced aid and trade flows could mean that the people in the poorestcountries pay the highest price for the profligacy of the credit bubble inNorth America and Europe.

Human rights are not a luxury for good times. Inaction in the face of climatechange is not a viable option. Global poverty does nothing for globalstability.  Rich countries will befollowing a myopic and self-defeating strategy if they ignore the most pressingchallenges of our times and focus solely on narrow financial interests.

This is not just about money. It is about sustainedattention, international collaboration and clear political will to tackle bigissues. The signs of concerted action by the G7 finance ministers and the Eurozonefinance ministers to address the financial crisis are welcome but they are notenough. Governmentsmust reduce the volatility in energy prices, food prices and the financialmarkets by ensuring sensible regulation, adequate protection for the rights of poorand vulnerable people, and long-term environmental sustainability. Governmentsmust show decisive leadership to build a global economy that is green and wherebetter lives and livelihoods for all is more important than a system thatrewards a privileged few.