Greenpeace launches diplomatic initiative to ban bomb making material

Press release - 4 May, 2004
At a press conference in the United Nations today, Greenpeace launched a Treaty for a complete ban on material capable of being used for nuclear weapons. As a consequence of the failure of nuclear-armed states to disarm and stop the production, stockpiling and use of nuclear materials, the new Treaty was presented to diplomats and is designed to control nuclear material production as well as the destruction of current global nuclear stocks (1).

While member States of the nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty meet for the second week of deliberations on disarmament at the UN, the proposed Treaty drafted by Greenpeace, if adopted will force greater nuclear disarmament, greatly reduce the proliferation and security risks caused by civil nuclear material stockpiles and halts any commercial nuclear programmes. In addition, all stocks of weapons usable nuclear material (i.e. plutonium and highly enriched uranium) in the military stockpiles would be placed under international control and any commercial trade would be prohibited (2).

"Nuclear proliferation and the threat of terrorists obtaining nuclear materials has dominated the international agenda in recent years. Yet there is something that can be done. The fact that a treaty has not been negotiated is due to the opposition of the nuclear weapon states, and the large players in the commercial nuclear industry. They do not want the international community to get their hands on their weapons materials. But unless such a Treaty is negotiated, prospects for a nuclear free world will remain non-existent," said Shaun Burnie from Greenpeace International.

Greenpeace also today released a new investigation into the 'Khan network' that describes in detail how Khan operated to help Pakistan obtain the bomb and later went onto assist others in this quest (3). The report also explores one particular area of 'sensitive technology' that could be used to manufacture weapons useable nuclear material - the uranium enrichment process and how one company Urenco operates in this area.

"The exposing of the Khan network highlighted one of the problems of nuclear proliferation, the Greenpeace fissile material treaty if adopted would reduce the threat posed by such technology transfers," concluded Burnie.

The need to control nuclear materials and technology has been recognised since it became clear in 1939 that a fission chain reaction could be produced in uranium, releasing large amounts of energy that could be used to make a nuclear explosion. Demands for control escalated in 1945 when the awesome devastation produced by nuclear weapons in Hiroshima and Nagasaki became widely known.

Fissile material was rare in the early days of the nuclear age and at that time it was measured in micro-grams. Nearly sixty years later, it is estimated that today's it is nearly 2,000 tonnes. Over the next decade tens of tonnes more of weapons-useable material is to be produced by the commercial nuclear industry (4).

Notes: (1). Greenpeace International's Comprehensive Fissile Material Treaty was drafted by external experts with legal and nuclear weapons/fissile material background, and Greenpeace staff, and is available at www.Greenpeace.org.Together with a background briefing that summarizes the last 60 years of efforts to negotiate controls and a Treaty on fissile materials.(2). While most military production of plutonium and highly enriched uranium has halted, stocks of plutonium in commercial reprocessing and MOX fuel programs are still increasing dramatically and are set to continue over the next decade. In Japan, France, the UK and Russia, stocks of plutonium will increase by as much as 125 tons by 2015, equal to 50% of all plutonium production by the nuclear weapon states during half a century of the Cold War. Of major concern is the plan by Japan to start up a new 20 billion dollar plutonium reprocessing plant, capable of producing up to 7,000 kilograms of bomb material each year. Japan already has one of the world's largest stockpiles of plutonium, with not one gram being used in its commercial nuclear program.(3). Report: 'A.Q. Khan, Urenco and the proliferation of nuclear weapons technology - The symbiotic relation between nuclear energy and nuclear weapons. Written by Joop Boer, Henk van der Keur, Karel Koster and Frank Slijper.(3). The commercial nuclear industry have consistently sought to confuse the debate over so-called weapons grade plutonium produced in dedicated military programs, in comparison to reactor grade plutonium produced in commercial nuclear power reactors. Fissile material as referred to in Greenpeace'Treaty covers all direct use nuclear material, plutonium and highly enriched uranium, which in of itself can be used to make nuclear weapons. Unfortunately for the commercial plutonium industry, led by AREVA and BNFL in Europe and JNFL in Japan, the plutonium they are in the business of producing is direct use nuclear material, as classified Category 1 by the International Atomic Energy Agency.