{"id":301,"date":"2017-05-16T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2017-05-16T00:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.greenpeace.org\/canada\/uncategorized\/301\/greenpeace-launches-worldwide-campaign-for-free-speech\/"},"modified":"2025-07-02T04:22:43","modified_gmt":"2025-07-02T08:22:43","slug":"greenpeace-launches-worldwide-campaign-for-free-speech","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.greenpeace.org\/canada\/en\/press-release\/301\/greenpeace-launches-worldwide-campaign-for-free-speech\/","title":{"rendered":"Greenpeace launches worldwide campaign for free speech"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

Montreal, 16 May, 2017 — Greenpeace has launched a new worldwide campaign for free speech today to stand up to Canadian logging giant Resolute Forest Products\u2019 massive legal attacks on its critics, which threaten the existence of this global environmental movement. These meritless lawsuits are just the tip of the iceberg and part of a global trend of SLAPP (strategic lawsuits against public participation) litigation which aims to throttle civic advocacy.<\/p>\n

Instead of focusing on fully adopting sustainable forestry, investing in healthy forests, and creating jobs, Resolute is trying to intimidate critics like Greenpeace with two massive multimillion dollar lawsuits that threaten free speech.Today, Greenpeace US is launching a new report, \u201cClearcutting Free Speech: How Resolute Forest Products is going to extremes to silence critics of its controversial logging practices\u201d[1], presenting the implications of logging company Resolute Forest Products massive legal attack on its critics, which aims to redefine activism as criminal activity.<\/p>\n

\u201cGreenpeace has gained international recognition as an independent environmental watchdog because we raise our voices without fear. That is public interest advocacy, not a criminal activity. The voices of our supporters will not be shut down now because a logging company like Resolute wants to get away with logging in intact forests,\u201d said Greenpeace International Executive Director Bunny McDiarmid.<\/p>\n

If Resolute\u2019s lawsuits succeed, the cases could set a dangerous precedent of shutting down advocacy groups and corporate watchdogs and embolden companies around the world to use similar tactics against their own critics.<\/p>\n

In May 2016, Resolute filed a CAD$300 million lawsuit for racketeering and other claims in the United States against several Greenpeace entities, Stand.earth and individual activists. Prior to that, Resolute filed a CAD$7 million lawsuit for defamation and other claims against Greenpeace Canada and two of its staff in 2013, that is still ongoing. The company has also used intimidating legal and public relations tactics against other organisations including the Rainforest Alliance, an independent environmental auditor.<\/p>\n

Greenpeace is calling on support from free speech advocates around the world, including major international publishers such as Penguin Random House, HarperCollins, Simon & Schuster and Hachette — who purchase paper from Resolute. Greenpeace is inviting them to join the call to protect freedom of speech and the collective rights to organise on issues of public concern, like forest conservation.<\/p>\n

Greenpeace Canada Forest campaigner, Shane Moffatt, a defendant in the Canadian lawsuit, said:<\/p>\n

\u201cWe want a healthy forest where Indigenous Peoples rights are respected, jobs are secured for communities and fragile ecosystems are protected. The only way to get there is with open dialogue and free speech so all parties can work together to make these solutions a reality.\u201d<\/p>\n

Greenpeace US Senior Forest Campaigner, Amy Moas, a defendant in the US lawsuit, said:<\/p>\n

\u201cIf Resolute wins these lawsuits, not only could it mean a world without Greenpeace and the 45 year record of a movement to protect the environment, but a world where free speech becomes more restricted for advocacy groups, individuals, artists, journalists and publishers.<\/p>\n

\u201cResolute aims to label environmental advocacy work as criminal activity in the United States and to set a precedent to silence rightful dissent across the board. Resolute Forest Products is not counting on the millions of people that make the environmental movement so strong. Together, our voices are vital for protecting our rights, our communities and the planet,\u201d concluded Moas.<\/p>\n

Despite the ongoing lawsuits, Greenpeace continues to have an open door for Resolute, to work together for lasting solutions in the boreal forest for all stakeholders involved.<\/p>\n

ENDS<\/p>\n

Notes to editors:<\/strong><\/p>\n

[1] Click here<\/a> to access the full \u201cClearcutting Free Speech: How Resolute Forest Products is going to extremes to silence critics of its controversial logging practices\u201d report or copy the following URL in your browser: http:\/\/www.greenpeace.org\/usa\/clearcutting-free-speech<\/p>\n

[2] Click here<\/a> to obtain images, videos and other materials related to this release or copy the following URL in your browser: http:\/\/media.greenpeace.org\/collection\/27MZIFJJU3322<\/p>\n

[3] SLAPP suits are a growing trend which corporations and anyone with enough resources to create legal claims without merit use as a way to silence any type of criticism, labelling advocacy organizations and their workers as \u2018criminal enterprises\u2019 and intimidating them through multi-million dollar lawsuits. Most damagingly, such SLAPP suits suck up time and energy that should be spent campaigning for important causes, such as protecting the environment. Only corporations with deep pockets benefit from launching such lawsuits, society and public interest suffers. Anti-SLAPP legislation exists in many provinces and states. Although Resolute is based in Qu\u00e9bec, its lawsuit was filed in Ontario, which, unlike Qu\u00e9bec, did not have anti-SLAPP legislation at the time of filing.<\/p>\n

Contacts:<\/p>\n

Philippa Duchastel de Montrouge, Communications Officer, Greenpeace Canada, pduchast@greenpeace.org <\/p>\n