{"id":7302,"date":"2016-07-21T06:55:00","date_gmt":"2016-07-21T06:55:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/dev.p4.greenpeace.org\/post\/from-loreal-to-revlon-which-brands-are-polluting-the-ocean-with-microbeads\/"},"modified":"2025-07-02T09:43:27","modified_gmt":"2025-07-02T07:43:27","slug":"from-loreal-to-revlon-which-brands-are-polluting-the-ocean-with-microbeads","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.greenpeace.org\/international\/story\/7302\/from-loreal-to-revlon-which-brands-are-polluting-the-ocean-with-microbeads\/","title":{"rendered":"From L’Or\u00e9al to Revlon, which brands are polluting the ocean with microbeads?"},"content":{"rendered":"

After discovering that\u00a0170 types<\/a>\u00a0of seafood contained traces of microplastics, Greenpeace East Asia decided to put 30 of the world\u2019s biggest cosmetic and personal care brands to the test.<\/em><\/p>\n

\"Product

Product pictures of microbeads\/micro plastics which were found in cosmetical products from Germany and filtered out.<\/p><\/div>\n

Microbeads might be best known to you as the coloured beads in your shower gel and facial scrubs, but more recently they\u2019ve gained notoriety for wreaking havoc<\/a>\u00a0on our ecosystems and marine life.<\/p>\n

The tiny pieces of plastic<\/a> are added to everyday cosmetic products as an exfoliating agent, or for colour and texture. They\u2019re tiny enough to travel down your plughole and right through water filtration systems and into our rivers, lakes and oceans.<\/p>\n

A single tube of face wash can contain up to 360,000 of these tiny plastic spheres. That means that once we have finished washing our faces or brushing our teeth, we unwittingly release thousands of pieces of plastic into our environment, where they go on to \u2018gently exfoliate\u2019 the digestive tracts of seabirds<\/a> and even enter the food chain.<\/p>\n

They can also act as agents to absorb and release toxic chemicals around the sea and into the marine life that ingests them.<\/p>\n<\/lite-youtube>\n

How do the companies stack up?<\/h3>\n

Greenpeace East Asia decided to put 30 of the world\u2019s top companies to the test and rank them according to the strength of their commitment to getting rid of microbeads once and for all.<\/p>\n

Check out how they rank.<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n

While most of the brands claim to have their plastic pollution problem under control, not one of them succeeded in meeting Greenpeace\u2019s environmental standards, meaning that they still have the potential to allow this contamination into our waterways.<\/p>\n

Even the top scoring brands in the rank, like Beiersdorf, which has allegedly fulfilled all its commitments to its microbead ban pledge, have only taken action to remove one type of plastic-polythene- from its products, which gives a free rein to other polluting plastics.<\/p>\n

The harmful effects of microbeads are now well known and we\u2019re gathering more and more evidence that they\u2019re bad news.<\/a> Many of the world\u2019s biggest brands have made pledges to rein in these toxic terrors, but they\u2019re still not that simple for consumers to avoid.<\/p>\n

Firstly, while some companies proudly tout the presence of \u2018skin-polishing\u2019 microbeads in their product descriptions, others contain microbeads that can be barely seen with the naked eye and only appear in the ingredients list as polyethylene, polypropylene or polystyrene.<\/p>\n

Secondly, many brands have made promises to do the right thing and ban the beads, but each brand has its own, narrow or confusing definition of what constitutes a microbead. These definitions can vary from function of the product, role of the microbead and can even the shape of the microbead, creating loopholes that could allow the inclusion of microbeads that don\u2019t fit into these limited definitions.<\/p>\n

What\u2019s the solution?<\/h3>\n

So how to get these pesky microbeads out of our products and out of our oceans? The solution is simple. Our governments need to step in and enforce a total ban on the sale and production of all solid microplastic ingredients in all personal care products.<\/p>\n

The good news is, it\u2019s already happening. The US announced a ban<\/a> on microbeads in January of this year, while campaigns to do the same are building momentum<\/a> all around the world.<\/p>\n

In the meantime, you can vote with your wallet and choose brands that don\u2019t add to this pointless pollution. Check out Flora and Fauna International\u2019s Good Scrub Guide<\/a> or download the Beat the Microbead app<\/a> and send a clear message to manufacturers that microbeads are unwanted and unnecessary.<\/p>\n

Taehyun Park is an Oceans Campaigner at Greenpeace East Asia<\/em><\/p>\n

*Greenpeace East Asia consulted Fauna & Flora International on expected good practice with respect to corporate commitments to ending microplastic ingredient use.<\/em><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

After discovering that\u00a0170 types\u00a0of seafood contained traces of microplastics, Greenpeace East Asia decided to put 30 of the world\u2019s biggest cosmetic and personal care brands to the test.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":18,"featured_media":13567,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_planet4_optimize_post_is_variant":false,"_planet4_optimize_experiment_name":"","_planet4_optimize_variant_name":"","ep_exclude_from_search":false,"p4_og_title":"","p4_og_description":"","p4_og_image":"","p4_og_image_id":"","p4_seo_canonical_url":"","p4_campaign_name":"not set","p4_local_project":"not set","p4_basket_name":"not set","p4_department":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[70,73],"tags":[67,85,86,91],"p4-page-type":[59],"class_list":["post-7302","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-nature","category-social-and-economic-systems","tag-consumption","tag-oceans","tag-food","tag-health","p4-page-type-story"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.greenpeace.org\/international\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7302","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.greenpeace.org\/international\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.greenpeace.org\/international\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.greenpeace.org\/international\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/18"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.greenpeace.org\/international\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=7302"}],"version-history":[{"count":12,"href":"https:\/\/www.greenpeace.org\/international\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7302\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":76281,"href":"https:\/\/www.greenpeace.org\/international\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7302\/revisions\/76281"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.greenpeace.org\/international\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/13567"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.greenpeace.org\/international\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=7302"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.greenpeace.org\/international\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=7302"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.greenpeace.org\/international\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=7302"},{"taxonomy":"p4-page-type","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.greenpeace.org\/international\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/p4-page-type?post=7302"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}