{"id":7638,"date":"2016-08-23T09:00:00","date_gmt":"2016-08-23T09:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/dev.p4.greenpeace.org\/post\/microbeads-how-did-companies-respond\/"},"modified":"2019-11-06T09:49:17","modified_gmt":"2019-11-06T08:49:17","slug":"microbeads-how-did-companies-respond","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.greenpeace.org\/international\/story\/7638\/microbeads-how-did-companies-respond\/","title":{"rendered":"Microbeads: How did companies respond?"},"content":{"rendered":"

Remember THIS<\/a> video?<\/p>\n

Back in July, Greenpeace East Asia ranked 30 global companies<\/a> to see how they measured in terms of their commitment to phasing out microbeads \u2013 the tiny terrors that are often found in shower gels and facial scrubs, and are known to wreak havoc on our ecosystems and marine life.<\/p>\n

\"Product

Product pictures of microbeads\/micro plastics which were found in cosmetical products from Germany and filtered out.<\/p><\/div>\n

Among the\u00a0major companies<\/a>, such as Estee Lauder, Chanel and Amway we found that a majority of major brands have failed to remove microplastics from their products,\u00a0despite promises<\/a>; whilst others simply refused to publicly acknowledge the environmental impact of microbeads.<\/p>\n

So what’s happened since Greenpeace East Asia released the\u00a0microbeads ranking<\/a>? Here’s what some have said:<\/p>\n

1. Proctor and Gamble<\/h3>\n

The American company, which owns products such as Pantene, Oral-B, and Olay have said their \u201cgoal is to remove plastic microbeads from all our cleansers and toothpastes by 2017.\u201d<\/a><\/p>\n

In an email response to Greenpeace East Asia, Jack McAneny, Director of Sustainability at Procter & Gamble said:<\/p>\n

\u201cIn reviewing your report we recognized that we have an opportunity to better clarify our microbead definition and that our commitment is to remove plastic microbeads (we will replace the term \u201cpolyethylene\u201d with \u201cplastic microbeads\u201d in our commitment to be more clear).\u201d<\/em><\/p>\n

\"Dr

Dr David Santillo is testing for microbeads, Greenpeace Science Lab, Exeter University.<\/p><\/div>\n

2. Shiseido<\/h3>\n

The Japanese company that owns hair and makeup brands like Nars, Tsubaki and Bare Minerals have since made a public commitment saying that they will globally replace products containing microbeads \u201cno later than 2018 depending on the characteristics of the products\u201d<\/a>, as they \u201crecognize the need due to environmental risks and such.\u201d<\/p>\n

Previously, Shiseido did not publicly disclose any commitment to phasing out microbeads.<\/p>\n

3. Amway<\/h3>\n

In an email response to Greenpeace East Asia, Julie Wu from the Corporate Relations Division at Amway Taiwan has said:<\/p>\n

\u201cAmway will use bio-degradable ingredients to replace microbeads from Oct 1 2016 in order to protect the environment. The “Artistry Essentials Polishing Scrub” is the only product which contains microbeads, among Amway’s 450+ products. Other products do not contain this ingredient.\u201d (translated from Chinese)<\/em><\/p>\n<\/lite-youtube>\n

4. LG Household and Healthcare<\/h3>\n

After the Greenpeace East Asia report was released that ranked LG H&H weak on transparency, it immediately announced<\/a>:<\/p>\n

\u201cLG H&H agrees to opinions of global NGOs and the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) that marine pollution, caused by microbeads, may destroy marine ecosystem and also potentially affect human beings.\u201d<\/em><\/p>\n

They have committed to \u201cstop using [microbeads] in facial scrubs and other personal washing products in domestic and overseas markets by the end of 2016.\u201d<\/p>\n

\"Products

Products containing microbeads.<\/p><\/div>\n

5. KOSE<\/h3>\n

The Japanese company that has a large presence around Asia has committed to phase out microbeads in wash products by June 2018 at the latest. A statement on their website, which appeared after the release of the ranking, says that since 2014 they have made \u201cthe switch to plant derived materials with less negative environmental impact.\u201d<\/a><\/p>\n

\"Microbeads

Greenpeace activists in the streets of Seoul after they carried out an action on the Han river where they symbolically collected microbeads in a protest against the wide use of the tiny plastics in the cosmetic and personal care industry.<\/p><\/div>\n

6. Estee Lauder<\/h3>\n

The company has \u201ccommitted to voluntarily remove microbeads \u2026by the end of our Fiscal Year 2017.\u201d<\/a><\/p>\n

Previously, Estee Lauder had not released a global statement and said that removal only applied to certain cleaning products.<\/p>\n

\"Microplastics

Microplastic found in fish.<\/p><\/div>\n

So what next?<\/h3>\n

Whilst it\u2019s great that companies are listening and widening their commitment, they need to move faster. Plastic pollution is getting out of control and the evidence is clear \u2013 according to the World Economic Forum (WEF), by 2050 the world\u2019s oceans will contain more plastic than fish<\/a>; microbeads are often mistaken as food<\/a> for marine life; and researchers have recently shown that microplastics are capable of leaching and releasing toxic chemicals into the seafood we eat<\/a>.<\/p>\n

Greenpeace will continue to monitor the world’s biggest cosmetics and personal care product companies to track their microbead pledges, but we can\u2019t do it alone! We need governments to outlaw microbeads like they have done in the United States<\/a>, with other governments such as the UK<\/a> (due 2017), Taiwan<\/a>, India<\/a>, Australia<\/a>, and Canada<\/a> – which has officially declared it as \u201ctoxic\u201d<\/a> – following suit.<\/p>\n

Together we can work towards healthy oceans AND smooth skin by putting a major stop on the microbead.<\/p>\n

Taehyun Park is an Oceans Campaigner at Greenpeace East Asia<\/em><\/p>\n

\n

What you can do to ban the bead<\/h2>\n
    \n
  1. Check the list of ingredients before purchasing! If you see polyethylene, polypropylene or polystyrene (also sometimes labelled as PE, PP, PET or nylon) then save your money for something else.<\/li>\n
  2. Download the Beat the Microbead app to check if a product contains microbeads simply by scanning the barcode with your smartphone camera.<\/li>\n
  3. At the cosmetics counter ask whether any of their products contain any plastic.<\/li>\n
  4. Rifle through your cosmetics drawer and send back any product that contains microbeads back to the company<\/li>\n
  5. Start a petition or contact your government to ban microbeads<\/li>\n
  6. Support Greenpeace\u2019s campaign to say NO to plastic pollution<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

    Back in July, Greenpeace East Asia ranked 30 global companies to see how they measured in terms of their commitment to phasing out microbeads \u2013 the tiny terrors that are often found in shower gels and facial scrubs, and are known to wreak havoc on our ecosystems and marine life.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":18,"featured_media":13567,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_planet4_optimize_post_is_variant":false,"_planet4_optimize_experiment_name":"","_planet4_optimize_variant_name":"","ep_exclude_from_search":false,"p4_og_title":"","p4_og_description":"","p4_og_image":"","p4_og_image_id":"","p4_seo_canonical_url":"","p4_campaign_name":"","p4_local_project":"","p4_basket_name":"","p4_department":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[70,73],"tags":[67,85,86,91],"p4-page-type":[59],"class_list":["post-7638","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-nature","category-social-and-economic-systems","tag-consumption","tag-oceans","tag-food","tag-health","p4-page-type-story"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.greenpeace.org\/international\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7638","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.greenpeace.org\/international\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.greenpeace.org\/international\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.greenpeace.org\/international\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/18"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.greenpeace.org\/international\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=7638"}],"version-history":[{"count":19,"href":"https:\/\/www.greenpeace.org\/international\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7638\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":26146,"href":"https:\/\/www.greenpeace.org\/international\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7638\/revisions\/26146"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.greenpeace.org\/international\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/13567"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.greenpeace.org\/international\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=7638"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.greenpeace.org\/international\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=7638"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.greenpeace.org\/international\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=7638"},{"taxonomy":"p4-page-type","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.greenpeace.org\/international\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/p4-page-type?post=7638"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}