{"id":10737,"date":"2025-05-12T14:31:05","date_gmt":"2025-05-12T11:31:05","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.greenpeace.org\/romania\/?p=10737"},"modified":"2025-07-02T10:34:54","modified_gmt":"2025-07-02T07:34:54","slug":"dosarul-puz-ului-pentru-neptun-deep-problemele-avizului-de-mediu-n-au-fost-luate-in-considerare-de-instanta","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.greenpeace.org\/romania\/comunicat-presa\/10737\/dosarul-puz-ului-pentru-neptun-deep-problemele-avizului-de-mediu-n-au-fost-luate-in-considerare-de-instanta\/","title":{"rendered":"Dosarul PUZ-ului pentru Neptun Deep: problemele avizului de mediu n-au fost luate \u00een considerare de instan\u021b\u0103"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p><strong>Bucure\u0219ti, 12 mai<\/strong> \u2013 Tribunalul Bucure\u0219ti a pronun\u021bat, \u00een prim\u0103 instan\u021b\u0103 o decizie nefavorabil\u0103 Greenpeace \u00een <a href=\"https:\/\/portal.just.ro\/3\/SitePages\/Dosar.aspx?id_dosar=300000001110620&amp;id_inst=3\">procesul de anulare a planului urbanistic zonal (PUZ) <\/a>pentru lucr\u0103rile onshore din Tuzla dedicate proiectului Neptun Deep. \u00cen solu\u021bia publicat\u0103 pe scurt, Tribunalul a hot\u0103r\u00e2t s\u0103 nu analizeze pe fond nelegalitatea avizului de mediu invocat\u0103 de c\u0103tre Greenpeace Rom\u00e2nia. Cu toate acestea, alte instan\u021be din Rom\u00e2nia au admis \u0219i analizat astfel de argumente \u00een alte procese similare.<\/p>\n\n<p>Organiza\u021bia de mediu a semnalat mai multe nereguli \u00een leg\u0103tur\u0103 cu avizul de mediu eliberat pentru PUZ-ul dedicat proiectului Neptun Deep:<\/p>\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>Nu a fost efectuat un studiu de evaluare a impactului climatic;<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Nu a fost evaluat impactul asupra corpurilor de ap\u0103;<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Nu a fost parcurs\u0103 procedura de consult\u0103ri transfrontaliere \u00een cadrul procesului de aprobare;<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Nu a fost efectuat un studiu de evaluare adecvat\u0103.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n<p>\u201eNe afl\u0103m \u00eentr-o situa\u021bie juridic\u0103 atipic\u0103, \u00een care unele instan\u021be iau \u00een considerare aspectele problematice ale avizelor de mediu, \u00een timp ce altele nu. Riscurile de mediu r\u0103m\u00e2n, chiar dac\u0103 nu li s-a dat aten\u021bie \u00een acest proces. O s\u0103 continu\u0103m cu demersurile p\u00e2n\u0103 c\u00e2nd aceste riscuri vor fi analizate \u00een mod corespunz\u0103tor de c\u0103tre justi\u021bia din Rom\u00e2nia\u201d a declarat Vlad C\u0103tun\u0103, Coordonator de Campanii, Greenpeace Rom\u00e2nia.<\/p>\n\n<p>Argumentele Greenpeace de drept au vizat at\u00e2t aspecte de urbanism c\u00e2t \u0219i de mediu, respectiv au fost invocate nerespectarea unor condi\u021bii esen\u021biale la adoptarea PUZ-ului \u0219i a avizelor ce au stat la baza acestuia, inclusiv a avizului de mediu emis \u00een cadrul procedurii.<\/p>\n\n<p><em>\u201eConsider\u0103m c\u0103 argumentele noastre sunt pertinente, a\u0219a \u00eenc\u00e2t vom lua decizia de a face sau nu recurs \u00eempotriva solu\u021biei dup\u0103 ce vom vedea \u0219i argumentele din sentin\u021ba Tribunalului Bucure\u0219ti. Credem cu t\u0103rie c\u0103 evaluarea de mediu trebuie s\u0103 fie corespunz\u0103toare \u0219i pertinent\u0103 pentru orice proiect, indiferent c\u00e2t de mare ar fi acesta, \u00eentruc\u00e2t beneficiile economice pe care le-ar putea avea nu pot justifica nicidecum o evaluare pur formal\u0103 a impactului asupra unei problematici de mediu complexe (cu arii naturale protejate aflate \u00een proximitate) inclusiv asupra schimb\u0103rilor climatice, care poate avea consecin\u021be ireversibile, fa\u021b\u0103 de poten\u021bialele beneficii economice, efemere prin defini\u021bie.\u201d<\/em> a declarat Mihaela Maravela, avocat barou Bucure\u0219ti.<\/p>\n\n<p>OMV Petrom \u0219i Romgaz au solicitat cheltuieli de judecat\u0103 de peste 250.000 euro \u00een cadrul procesului. Instan\u021ba a decis c\u0103 organiza\u021bia de mediu trebuie s\u0103 pl\u0103teasc\u0103 16.000 euro \u00een total c\u0103tre companii.<\/p>\n\n<p>Decizia vine \u00een contextul \u00een care Ministrul Energiei, Sebastian Burduja, a solicitat companiilor din energie s\u0103 cear\u0103 daune exagerate \u00een litigiile cu ONG-urile de mediu care atac\u0103 proiecte controversate cu impact ridicat asupra mediului \u0219i s\u0103n\u0103t\u0103\u021bii. Rom\u00e2nia \u0219i-a asumat obliga\u021bii sub tratate europene \u0219i interna\u021bionale la cel mai \u00eenalt nivel, de a asigura acces la justi\u021bie organiza\u021biilor de mediu \u00een cauze de interes public (costuri rezonabile, calitate procesual\u0103 activ\u0103), cum ar fi Conven\u021bia de la Aarhus.<\/p>\n\n<p>Contact:<\/p>\n\n<p>Vlad C\u0103tun\u0103, Coordonator Campanii, Greenpeace Rom\u00e2nia, vlad.catuna@greenpeace.org, 0754029180<\/p>\n\n<p>Mihnea Matache, Purt\u0103tor de cuv\u00e2nt, Greenpeace Rom\u00e2nia, mihnea.matache@greenpeace.org, 0749135749<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>\u00cen solu\u021bia publicat\u0103 pe scurt, Tribunalul a hot\u0103r\u00e2t s\u0103 nu analizeze pe fond nelegalitatea de mediu invocat\u0103 de c\u0103tre Greenpeace Rom\u00e2nia.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":34,"featured_media":10738,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"ep_exclude_from_search":false,"p4_og_title":"","p4_og_description":"","p4_og_image":"","p4_og_image_id":"","p4_seo_canonical_url":"","p4_campaign_name":"","p4_local_project":"","p4_basket_name":"","p4_department":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[2,31],"tags":[125,117],"p4-page-type":[29],"class_list":["post-10737","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-clima-si-energie","category-greenpeace","tag-marea-neagra-gaz-fosil","tag-clima-1","p4-page-type-comunicat-presa"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.greenpeace.org\/romania\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10737","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.greenpeace.org\/romania\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.greenpeace.org\/romania\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.greenpeace.org\/romania\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/34"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.greenpeace.org\/romania\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=10737"}],"version-history":[{"count":5,"href":"https:\/\/www.greenpeace.org\/romania\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10737\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":11179,"href":"https:\/\/www.greenpeace.org\/romania\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10737\/revisions\/11179"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.greenpeace.org\/romania\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/10738"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.greenpeace.org\/romania\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=10737"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.greenpeace.org\/romania\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=10737"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.greenpeace.org\/romania\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=10737"},{"taxonomy":"p4-page-type","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.greenpeace.org\/romania\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/p4-page-type?post=10737"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}