Automatic cameras

by Guest Blogger

August 15, 2005

“Please work”, said Jason Box (Ohio State Geography/Byrd Polar Research

Center glaciologist) as if in prayer, before we even land. This morning

he had retrieved the first of his automatic monitoring cameras – set up

last May. It had taken exactly one photo (the day after he set it up),

and then stopped working. Definitely a setback, although not entirely

surprising given the harsh conditions, precarious nature of electronics

and this relatively novel application of automatic monitoring.

Now we are landing at a second site. This one on the ice sheet itself.

As soon as Hughie (heli pilot) gives us the OK, we’re out of the

helicopter and getting the camera down. When Jason installed it, the

white battery box was at ground level, but as usual the winter snow has

all melted by now – leaving the batteries almost out of reach. Carefully

we lower the mounting pole and open the airtight camera enclosure.

Jason’s too eager to check the camera to explain his setup just now, but

we go over it later.

How it works

The camera is a regular consumer brand digital still camera connected to

something called an “intervalometer” – a device that operates at

intervals. The intervalometer takes a picture every few hours throughout

the day. The power comes from two sealed gel cell batteries, like car

batteries but smaller, recharged by a 20 watt solar panel, which Jason

calculates supplies about twice as much power as the system needs. The

enclosure is the same type used for security cameras, and is packed with

silicon desiccant to absorb the moisture inside and keep the glass from

fogging up.

Jason tested his equipment in an Ohio University cold room with

temperature sensors inside the camera. Even at -4 Fahrenheit (-20C) the

camera kept itself warm enough to stay just above freezing. Although

Jason first used a digital camera to do time lapse monitoring (of snow

drifts) in 1996, and Station Zackenberg has had a year-round camera on a

mountain since about the same time, the ones we took down today are the

first long term monitoring cameras on the ice cap that Jason knows of.

[View snow drift animation here:]

When Jason set the camera up on location, he and his college surveyed

the area and set out marker flags at known GPS coordinates to give him

some frame of reference when looking at the photos. The surrounding

landscape is changed over time by snow, rain and wind (although no

matter what time of year it is, the scenery at the camera site can be

described as “basically white”).

The all important data

When we get it down, the enclosure is intact, and the camera in good

shape. Jason gingerly pulls it out, and turns it on. “There are 516

pictures on this camera,” he tells me grinning. Looking at the images

back on the ship, we realize that he has succeeded in documenting a melt

lake forming – and draining, and forming, and draining, and so on. This

is slightly unexpected, and possibly interesting. Other melt lakes have

been observed to fill slowly, and then drain suddenly.

At the third site of the day, the camera proves more difficult to get

down. We end up using a hacksaw to cut through its mounting pole. This

camera has also worked. It monitored a ridge in the ice sheet. If the

ridge changed position as summer went on, then it was probably related

to climate events, if it stayed in one place it was probably structural

to the ice sheet. Just eyeballing the images, it looks like it didn’t move.

Later, the two working cameras will both be redeployed to monitor the

front of Jakobshavn glacier. Jakobshavn is a well-studied glacier that

has more than doubled in speed over the last ten years. Intensive

monitoring, using these cameras, will provide insight into how fast it

is moving at its bottom end, and how much its speed varies seasonally.

This is an outlet glacier – meaning it transports ice from the ice sheet

down into the ocean. Outlet glaciers are thought to be vital to the fate

of the Greenland ice sheet, and the fact that major ones surveyed on

this trip are speeding up is alarming.


The data collected, although not Earth shaking, will add to the body of

knowledge about what is happening to the Greenland ice sheet. Also

important, is that this method of collecting data can be applied in

other research areas as well ” such as monitoring the volume of ice

coming off glaciers in the form of icebergs.

This is often how science works, not with Jurassic Park like suddenness,

but with incremental steps forward. One experiment leading to the next,

and a continuing refinement of techniques. In fact, it took over a

decade, and hundreds-of-thousands of man-hours, before the authoritative

scientific body on the subject concluded that our planet is heating up

at least in part (probably mostly) because of our greenhouse gas

emissions (2001 Intergovernmental Panel on

Climate Change Third Assessment).

It’s folly to ignore so much painstakingly accumulated scientific

evidence – yet that is what many, including the Bush administration, are

trying to do. Despite their resistance, we need to start an energy

revolution – to go from a fossil fuel dominated energy strategy to one

that takes advantage of renewable energy technologies. If you are in the

U.S., your help is especially needed.

– Andrew

We Need Your Voice. Join Us!

Want to learn more about tax-deductible giving, donating stock and estate planning?

Visit Greenpeace Fund, a nonprofit, 501(c)(3) charitable entity created to increase public awareness and understanding of environmental issues through research, the media and educational programs.