• Skip to Navigation
  • Skip to Content
  • Skip to Footer
Greenpeace
  • About us
    • Our history
    • Greenpeace ships
    • Our leadership
    • Contact
  • Our work
    • Energy Transfer’s SLAPP lawsuit
    • Protecting the oceans
    • Fighting plastic pollution
    • Ending the climate crisis
    • California climate emergency
    • Defending democracy
    • Past campaigns
  • What you can do
    • Learn
    • Volunteer
    • Work with us
    • Take online action
    • Share your story
  • News and stories
    • News and media center
    • Our research
    • Campaign updates
    • Make a monthly gift
    • Leave a legacy
    • Other ways to give
    • Manage your donation
  • About us
  • Our work
  • What you can do
  • News and stories
Greenpeace
  • Home
  • About us
    • Our history
    • Greenpeace ships
    • Our leadership
    • Contact
  • Our work
    • Energy Transfer’s SLAPP lawsuit
    • Protecting the oceans
    • Fighting plastic pollution
    • Ending the climate crisis
    • California climate emergency
    • Defending democracy
    • Past campaigns
  • What you can do
    • Learn
    • Volunteer
    • Work with us
    • Take online action
    • Share your story
  • News and stories
    • News and media center
    • Our research
    • Campaign updates
  • Give
    • Make a monthly gift
    • Leave a legacy
    • Other ways to give
    • Manage your donation

News & Stories - Greenpeace

  • Greenpeace Team at Energy Transfer vs Greenpeace Trial In North Dakota. © Stephanie Keith / Greenpeace
    Democracy
    Pipelines SLAPP Anti-SLAPP Oil Spill

    Keystone oil spill shows need to protect rights to protest and free speech

    BISMARCK, NORTH DAKOTA (April 11, 2025)–In response to a reported 3,500 barrels of oil spilling from the Keystone pipeline this week in North Dakota, Sushma Raman, Interim Executive Director of…

    Lindsay Bigda
    April 11, 2025
  • Right to Dissent
    Exxon Voting Anti-SLAPP

    Greenpeace Report: Contaminating the Courts

    Corporations have increasingly begun to resurrect the legal strategy of expanding the concept of corporate personhood to argue that local, state, or federal environmental laws violate their constitutional rights. This trend isn’t totally new, but it has accelerated since the Supreme Court’s 2010 Citizens United v. FEC decision.

    Greenpeace Staff
    April 18, 2018

Worldwide site list

  • Greenpeace International
  • A
    • Africa
      • English •
      • Français
    • Aotearoa
    • Argentina
    • Australia
    • Austria
  • B
    • Belgium
      • Français •
      • Nederlands
    • Brazil
    • Bulgaria
  • C
    • Canada
      • English •
      • Français
    • Chile
    • Colombia
    • Croatia
    • Czech Republic
  • D
    • Denmark
  • E
    • East Asia
      • 中文简体 •
      • 繁體 •
      • 正體 •
      • 한국어 •
      • English
    • European Union
  • F
    • Finland
    • France
  • G
    • Germany
    • Greece
  • H
    • Hungary
  • I
    • India
      • English •
      • Hindi
    • Indonesia
    • Israel
    • Italy
  • J
    • Japan
  • L
    • Luxembourg
      • Deutsch •
      • Français
  • M
    • Malaysia
    • Mexico
    • Middle East and North Africa
      • العربية •
      • English •
      • Français
  • N
    • Netherlands
    • Norway
  • P
    • Peru
    • Philippines
    • Poland
    • Portugal
  • R
    • Romania
  • S
    • Slovakia
    • Slovenia
    • South Asia
    • Southeast Asia
    • Spain
      • Español •
      • Català •
      • Euskara •
      • Galego
    • Sweden
    • Switzerland
      • Deutsch •
      • Français
  • T
    • Thailand
    • Turkey
  • U
    • UK
    • Ukraine
    • USA
Follow us
  • Instagram
  • Twitter
  • Linkedin
  • Facebook
  • About us
  • Issues
  • News & stories
  • What you can do
  • Policies and guidelines
  • Work for Greenpeace
  • Ways to give
  • Greenpeace Fund
  • Greenpeace on Trial
Greenpeace USA Copyright 2026 1300 Eye Street, NW, STE 1100 E, Washington, D.C. 20005 1-800-722-6995 | Greenpeace USA is a trade name of Greenpeace, Inc., a U.S. tax-exempt nonprofit under 26 U.S.C. § 501(c)(4)