ALEC’s recent cockamamie schemes (and some good news)
by Jason Schwartz
Well start with the bad to get your heartbeat up.
- ALEC practically wrote the book on how to deny climate change, starting to peddle doubt since the early days of the Kyoto Protocol. Late last week Kert Davies documented the new lows ALEC has reached with its misinformation. ALEC has hosted industry-funded scientists to present on the benefits of atmospheric CO2, as if carbon pollution were a good thing for the world. It has supported bills in state legislatures that would make it mandatory to teach both sides of the climate scienceas if the 3% of scientists who express doubt present an equal case as the 97% of scientists who agree global warming is driven by human activities. And it has consistently lobbied on behalf of energy utilities against renewables. Please check out Kerts blog post. Its an eye opener.
- Speaking of eye openers, NRDCs Aliya Haq exposed ALECs comprehensive schemes to go guerilla-style on the EPA. Aliya puts it better than we can, and we definitely suggest you check her post out. But to give you a basic rundown, the EPA is on the verge of setting new carbon emissions limits for power plants, for the first time ever. This would be historicpower plants are the biggest source of emissions in the country. These limits would of course impact energy utilities in a big way. ALEC has gone on the attack on their behalf, waging smear campaigns against the EPA and supporting legislation in ten states that would limit state governments ability to enforce the new EPA standards.
- Rounding out Aliyas and Kerts analysis of ALEC climate obstructionism were two more great posts: In one, Union of Concerned Scientists Sam Gomberg looks into ALECs efforts to roll back Ohios impressive gains in renewables and efficiency standards.
- Meanwhile over at DeSmogBlog, Steve Horn documents the progress of two bills currently in the Florida legislature. Both of them are Exxon-and-ALEC-backed policy that would deeply damage transparency over the chemicals used in fracking. These disclosure laws are so full of loopholes with telling nicknamesanything people refer to as the Haliborton loophole can't be goodthat one original Texas legislator who initially sponsored the law lamented, This disclosure bill has a hole big enough to drive a Mack truck through.
- Over at the Institute for Southern Studies, Sue Sturgis documents how ALEC teamed with Duke Energy in its national efforts to fight stricter regulations on coal ash. If passed, those regulations would have paved the way for safer storage of coal ash, a toxic byproduct of coal burning. Had they gone throughinstead of being blocked through the actions of ALEC and DukeDukes huge spill in North Carolina earlier this month may have been avoided.
- Continuing on the Duke/ALEC connection, Gabe Elsner over at the Energy & Policy Institute has been writing about Dukes and ALECs combined efforts to attack net metering in North Carolina, while exposing similar anti-solar energy efforts in Washington stateand Kansas. Obviously, any program that would pay homeowners for sending excess electricity produced by their own rooftop solar installations back to the grid would be bad for big utilities. But it would be a positive in almost all other respects. The lengths to which ALEC has fought to defeat such a cornerstone of good renewable energy policy speak volumes about how scared the very notion makes big electric utilities.