Greenpeace: Quit Coal

Coal

Coal fired power plants are the biggest source of man made CO2 emissions. This makes coal energy the single greatest threat facing our climate.

Make no mistake: coal is dirty. From the destruction of mountaintops to the poisoning of our water and air to global warming, coal is a threat to our health and environment.

To secure a safe climate and healthy future, we must end our dependence on coal. The good news is that with clean, renewable energy, we can get off coal while creating jobs, saving consumers money, and growing our economy.

Coal Fuels Global Warming

Global warming is a clear and present danger to America's public health, economy, and environment. One record-breaking hurricane season follows another. Declining mountain snowpack is aggravating water shortages in the West. California's destructive wildfire season has become longer and more destructive than ever before. This is what global warming looks like.

Coal is the most polluting of all fossil fuels and the largest single source of global warming pollution in the world. Currently one-third of all CO2 emissions comes from burning coal. To curb global warming pollution to the levels needed to minimize the risk of catastrophic global warming, we must end our use of coal in the U.S. within the next 30-40 years.

Unfortunately, governments around the world are allowing, and in some cases subsidizing, the construction of hundreds of new coal-fired power plants. If these plants are built, CO2 emissions from coal are expected to rise 60 percent by 2030, severely undermining efforts to tackle climate change. Here in the U.S., according to a Coal Moratorium NOW! survey, nearly 100 coal plants are currently under construction or in the planning process.

Coal is NOT Clean

Greenpeace image - Coal is DirtyAfter multi-million-dollar PR campaigns by the coal industry, many in government have become seduced by the illusion of “carbon-free coal.” The industry wants Americans to believe that coal can be made safe for the environment by capturing and permanently storing the global warming pollution.

This technology, Carbon, Capture and Storage (CCS) is a false hope. Despite tens of billions in public subsidies, it has never been made to work. The idea that the same coal industry that spilled enormous amounts of coal ash sludge last December in Tennessee will be able to permanently store billions of tons of a clear, odorless gas with no leakage is hard to imagine, to say the least. Yet vague promises of CCS are being used to justify building new coal-fired plants. But any new coal-fired power plant will contribute massively to the climate crisis.

Demand Real Change

Greenpeace image - Capitol Climate ActionThe world doesn't need more coal — we need an Energy Revolution. The world has enough technically accessible renewable energy to meet current energy demand almost six times over. Renewable technologies, such as wind, solar, sustainable bioenergy and more can revolutionize the ways we produce energy and prevent dangerous global warming.

People across the world are taking on the struggles themselves. Across the world environmental activists, students, doctors, church leaders and many more are mobilizing against coal. Greenpeace joins these activists in their efforts to save the climate and quit coal.

Learn more about the Capitol Climate Action, which occurred in March of 2009 and was the largest civil disobedience on global warming in U.S. history.

The latest updates

 

Meet Ross Bhappu, the money behind coal export proposals on the Columbia River

Blog by Joe Smyth | February 25, 2014

The coal industry’s efforts to export huge amounts of taxpayer-owned coal from Montana and Wyoming to Asia has generated unprecedented opposition in the Pacific Northwest – tens of thousands of people have rallied, attended public hearings, and...

Duke Energy and NC regulators face federal investigation

Blog by Jason Schwartz | February 14, 2014

It seems federal investigators have finally heard complaints that something fishy was up between environmental regulators and Big Coal in North Carolina. Since Duke Energy’s February 2nd coal ash spill, Greenpeace, Appalachian Voices, the...

Don’t trust North Carolina politicians responding to the coal ash spill – Duke Energy...

Blog by David Pomerantz | February 8, 2014

Earlier this week Greenpeace reported how Duke Energy lobbyists thwarted the federal EPA from regulating toxic coal ash in a way that could have prevented Duke’s Dan River spill. As that crisis continues unfolding, North Carolina state...

Goldman Sachs withdrawal from Carrix is another sign of the dim outlook for US coal...

Blog by Kelly Mitchell | January 8, 2014

2013 was a miserable year for coal export terminal backers. Proposed terminals in the Pacific Northwest faced unprecedented public opposition, in the form of packed hearing rooms, mass protests, and hundreds of thousands of public comments. Coal...

Looking back: Jim Rogers at Duke Energy

Blog by Brian Johnson | December 20, 2013

Photo credit Justin Ruckman It would be an impressive moment when a leader of the nation’s largest utility calls for the transformation of his industry. Only catch is, he has less than two weeks left on the job. Last week, Duke Energy chairman...

21 - 25 of 139 results.

Tags