Feature story - August 12, 2003
The Bush Administration has determined that it is good science and sound public policy to ship thousands of tons of deadly radioactive waste through virtually every major city in the U.S. to Yucca Mountain in Nevada for burial. Energy Secretary Spencer Abraham claims that burying radioactive wastes that will remain hazardous for over 240,000 years is a good idea because it is better to have one radioactive waste dump rather than 131 sites scattered around the country. Unfortunately, this argument rings as hollow as Yucca Mountain.
The Bush Administration has determined that it is good science
and sound public policy to ship thousands of tons of deadly
radioactive waste through virtually every major city in the U.S. to
Yucca Mountain in Nevada for burial. Energy Secretary Spencer
Abraham claims that burying radioactive wastes that will remain
hazardous for over 240,000 years is a good idea because it is
better to have one radioactive waste dump rather than 131 sites
scattered around the country.
Unfortunately, this argument rings as hollow as Yucca Mountain.
Mr. Abraham and the Bush administration will merely be creating an
additional radioactive waste dump unless they simultaneously shut
down every nuclear power plant in the U.S. While Greenpeace has
long encouraged an end to the nuclear era, this is not the Bush
administration's intent. Rather than bringing to an end to
America's expensive and dangerous flirtation with the atom, the
Bush Administration is extending the operating licenses for
existing nuclear reactors and intends to construct more nuclear
plants that will create even more long-lived radioactive waste.
Instead of Mr. Abraham's "one safe site" for these radioactive
wastes, the Bush Administration's plan will create a wagon train of
dirty bombs that will last for thirty years. With over 100,000
shipments across the United States, only the blind or the biased
can believe that this scheme will succeed with out incident. In
light of the attacks of September 11 and the continued threat of
nuclear terrorism, the administration's plan is both irresponsible
and dangerous.
If Al Qaeda terrorists are seeking radioactive materials for
dirty bombs, why would the Bush Administration place these deadly
wastes onto our highways, rail lines and waterways? Rather than
rolling these terrorist targets through major population centers
throughout the U.S., the Bush Administration should ensure that
radioactive wastes and the nuclear reactors that create them are
secure from terrorist attack. More than nine months after the
attacks on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon, the federal
government has done precious little to decrease the vulnerability
of nuclear power plants and the high-level radioactive waste they
produce.
Even after September 11th, the government's nuclear regulators
have repeatedly denied citizen petitions that would have increased
the level of safety for both nuclear reactors and the radioactive
waste stored at the reactor site. These same regulators, at the
behest of the nuclear industry, have opposed increasing the quality
of the security forces at nuclear power plants despite the fact
that nearly half of those forces failed their security drills prior
to September 11th. These nuclear bureaucrats repeatedly state that
they have received no specific credible threats against nuclear
power plants, despite the fact that, according to President Bush,
Al Qeada terrorists had diagrams of U.S nuclear power plants in the
caves of Tora Bora.
Even if the Bush Administration could magically transport all
the radioactive waste to Nevada without incident, accident or
terrorist attack, Yucca Mountain is eminently unsuitable for its
intended purpose. The federal government has never determined that
Yucca Mountain is the best site to store radioactive waste. Rather,
it is the only site the government has ever explored. Dumping
deadly radioactive waste in Yucca Mountain will not solve the
nuclear industry's problems; it will only create an additional
environmental disaster. No solution is possible unless and until
the government agrees to phase-out nuclear power and stop producing
radioactive waste. Only then can we begin a legitimate dialogue to
determine the best way to secure these deadly wastes and keep them
out of the biosphere for the next 240,000 years.
--John Passacantando
Executive Director
Greenpeace USA
(photo above courtesy Nuclear
Regulatory Commission)