Yes Men “Mourn” U.S. Chamber’s dropped lawsuit against them
by Connor Gibson
June 14, 2013
"Just as their case against us was finally heating up again, the Chamber decided to drop it," said former defendant Andy Bichlbaum of the Yes Men. "The Chamber knew this was our chance to challenge their silly claims and, since they claimed we had 'damaged' them, investigate the details of their finances through the discovery process. It's the height of rudeness to deprive us of this great opportunity." "The Chamber's lawsuit represented the only time in 17 years that anyone has been stupid enough to sue us," said former defendant Mike Bonanno. "This was the chance of a lifetime, and we profoundly deplore the Chamber's about-face."Apparently, revenge isn't a strong enough reason for the Chamber to to cough up information on their secret financial backers or their obstruction on solving the critical issue of global climate change, the issue which sparked the original Yes Men parody press event and ensuing lawsuit. The Chamber sued the Yes Menin 2009 for holding a press conference at the National Press Club on the Chamber's behalf, announcing a reversal on the Chamber's efforts to block climate change legislation. The false event was interrupted by an actual Chamber official named Eric Wohlschlegal, who told attending press, "This guy is a fake! He's lying!"See this video: The stunt threw the Chamber off balance as it had to clarifyit wouldnot stop obstructing national climate change policy. The following lawsuit was unprecedented for Yes Men hijinks. Even Dow Chemical didn't sue them, despitelosing $2 billion worth of stock when Yes Man Andy Bichlbaum posed as a Dow official on a live BBC interviewand took responsibility for the Bhopal chemical disaster (which Dow still won't own up to despite the death of 20,000 people). Yes Lab has a summary of the announcement at the Chamber's front steps in Washington, DC, including a list of questions the Yes Men wish the lawsuit's discovery process could have answered:
PolluterWatch has more on the U.S. Chamber of Commerce and its anti-environmental practices.Some of the things we could have asked in court had theynotwithdrawn their lawsuit:
- Why does the U.S. Chamber lie evenmorethan the American Petroleum Institute about thenumber of jobscreated by the Keystone XL pipeline?
- Why did the U.S. Chamber design ateaching programfor US schools that favors coal over clean energy sources?
- And whopaysthem to lie tochildren... andadults?
- Why does the U.S. Chamber expend somuch moneytocall into doubtthe mostmainstreamclimate science, andinsultthe most respected scientific bodies?
- Why does the U.S. Chamberfight not only unions, but even justshareholder activists?
- Why do theyfighteven tiny increases in the federal minimum wage?
- Why has the U.S. Chamber's law firmhired spiesin try to discredit anti-Chamber activists?
- And finally, why is the U.S. Chamber fighting so hard to keep corporations from having to reveal theirpolitical spending?