Fracking

Page - June 24, 2011
Politicians, industry, and some environmentalists are holding up natural gas as a solution to our addiction to coal. Gas industry giants like Exxon and Halliburton claim that gas "burns clean" and that it's "environmentally safe." But an extreme new approach to gas drilling called hydraulic fracturing—or fracking—is wreaking havoc on communities all over the country, as well as on our climate.

A shale-gas drilling and fracking site in Dimock, Pennsylvania.

Greenpeace is opposed to the practice of fracking until the impacts are fully investigated, understood, addressed, and regulated.

What is fracking? How does it work?

Large shale rock formations lie deep underground throughout much of the US. Some of these shale deposits, including the Marcellus Shale in the Eastern US, contain reserves of natural gas that cannot be exploited using conventional drilling methods.

Hydraulic fracturing involves drilling a deep well vertically into the reservoir formation and then turning it horizontally into the deposit. Sand, water, and chemicals are injected into the rock layer, creating cracks that allow the gas to seep out. These cracks can extend as much as a few hundred meters into the rock from the injection well.

View this diagram which illustrates how fracking works.

What are the problems with fracking?

 

Water:

The fracking process consumes huge amounts of water. It has been estimated that anywhere between 9000 and 29000 cubic metres of water is required for fracturing operations on a single well. This could cause problems with the sustainability of water resources even in temperate countries, and add to consumption pressures on supplies in more arid areas

The hazards associated with chemicals added to fracking fluids are very poorly understood. Indeed, in the US exemptions are made from Federal regulation and/or information is protected due to "commercial sensitivities. At least 260 chemicals are known to be present in around 197 products and some of these are known to be toxic, carcinogenic and mutagenic. These chemicals can contaminate groundwater due to failure of the integrity of the well bore and migration of contaminants through subsurface pathways.

Anywhere between 15 percent and 80 percent of the injected fracturing fluid returns to the surface as flowback water, the rest remaining underground. This water contains fracturing additives and their transformation products. Substances dissolved from the shale formation during fracturing such as heavy metals, hydrocarbons and naturally occurring radioactive elements.

Air pollution:

The vapor that rises from the "evaporation pits" where fracking wastewater is often stored has been recorded as containing the potent carcinogen benzene. Leaks in gas wells and pipelines may also contribute to air pollution and to greenhouse gas emissions. Large numbers of vehicle movements and the operation of generating plant can also cause significant air pollution with acid gases, hydrocarbons and fine particulates.

Greenhouse Gases:

While more data is needed, several studies have suggested that when you include the full carbon footprint from fracking—from the production of the chemicals to the uncaptured emissions of gas into the atmosphere—the global warming pollution could be as bad or worse than coal.

Noise pollution and landscape impacts:

Well drilling operations can cause severe landscape degradation and noise pollution simply as a result of normal operations, and these may impact on local wildlife through habitat degradation.

Where can I learn more?

Our friends at DeSmog Blog have produced a thorough report called Fracking the Future