print

Climate and Energy

Climate change and the threats of nuclear energy are real. That is why Greenpeace works to bring about a clean and just energy future. Tar sands and nuclear development plague the ecosystems and communities they occupy with safety and health risks. The Energy [R]evolution is a set of ready-to-implement solutions that lead away from the dangers of climate chaos and nuclear meltdown. It is a vision of the clean and just energy future for everyone on the planet.

Arctic

Glaciers are retreating. Ice caps are melting. Oceans are acidifying. The Arctic is under threat from both climate change and increased oil drilling activities. The Arctic is warming faster than any other place on our planet and is experiencing the most severe climate impacts on Earth. The Arctic has been called "the world's refrigerator," and one reason is the role of sea ice in regulating global climate. Greenpeace is pushing for a big, visionary measures to save the Arctic. 

Tar Sands

Greenpeace calls on oil companies and the Canadian government to stop the tar sands. We call for an end to industrialization in vast areas of Indigenous territories, forests and wetlands in northern Alberta.

 

Nuclear

Greenpeace fights nuclear power because it poses a serious threat to the environment and humanity. The expansion of nuclear power must be halted and nuclear plants shut down so that we can develop a clean energy future. That's why we are working to stop Darlington in Ontario and protect electricity consumers from a new round of nuclear debt.

Energy [R]evolution

Greenpeace pressures the Canadian government and mobilizes citizens to demand action on climate change. We have developed a comprehensive Energy [R]evolution for Canada. The Energy [R]evolution outlines a clean energy future that challenges the current destructive energy scenario. Join Canada's Energy [R]evolution and support renewable energy to fight climate change.

The latest updates

 
Boreal forest customers send us a letter

Boreal forest customers send us a letter

Blog entry by Stephanie Goodwin | June 28, 2012

Major customers of Boreal logging companies sent Greenpeace a letter today.  Actually, they sent it to all of us involved in the Canadian Boreal Forest Agreement (CBFA), 9 environmental organizations and 19 forest companies operating...

Enbridge’s Tragic Reminder

Enbridge’s Tragic Reminder

Blog entry by Mike Hudema | June 21, 2012 1 comment

On Monday, Enbridge the company that is proposing to build tarsands megapiplines to both the west and east coast had another spill in Alberta. The tar sands spill poured 230,000 litres of toxic tar sands crude into the environment. ...

See the Greenpeace oil spill ad rejected by Canada’s largest billboard company

See the Greenpeace oil spill ad rejected by Canada’s largest billboard company

Blog entry by Mike Hudema | June 19, 2012 8 comments

Last week after Alberta suffered yet another pipeline spill , this one threatening the drinking water supply of tens of thousands of Albertans, we wanted to send Premier Alison Redford a very clear message about the need to invest in...

Democracy, Dutch disease, and the tar sands

Democracy, Dutch disease, and the tar sands

Blog entry by Keith Stewart | June 1, 2012

Why is NDP leader Thomas Mulcair being denounced so vehemently for talking about Dutch disease? The term simply describes the effects of a resource boom. And there is no real debate as to whether or not the tar sands boom has driven...

People power vs Enbridge’s multi-million dollar pipeline PR campaign

People power vs Enbridge’s multi-million dollar pipeline PR campaign

Blog entry by Melina Laboucan-Massimo | May 30, 2012

Greenpeace may not have their $5 million to spend on ads, but we stole Enbridge’s spotlight yesterday.   Enbridge, which is trying to build a new tar sands pipeline across the Rockies and through the Great Bear rainforest,...

26 - 30 of 162 results.

Topics
Tags