print

Climate and Energy

Climate change and the threats of nuclear energy are real. That is why Greenpeace works to bring about a clean and just energy future. Tar sands and nuclear development plague the ecosystems and communities they occupy with safety and health risks. The Energy [R]evolution is a set of ready-to-implement solutions that lead away from the dangers of climate chaos and nuclear meltdown. It is a vision of the clean and just energy future for everyone on the planet.

Arctic

Glaciers are retreating. Ice caps are melting. Oceans are acidifying. The Arctic is under threat from both climate change and increased oil drilling activities. The Arctic is warming faster than any other place on our planet and is experiencing the most severe climate impacts on Earth. The Arctic has been called "the world's refrigerator," and one reason is the role of sea ice in regulating global climate. Greenpeace is pushing for a big, visionary measures to save the Arctic. 

Tar Sands

Greenpeace calls on oil companies and the Canadian government to stop the tar sands. We call for an end to industrialization in vast areas of Indigenous territories, forests and wetlands in northern Alberta.

 

Nuclear

Greenpeace fights nuclear power because it poses a serious threat to the environment and humanity. The expansion of nuclear power must be halted and nuclear plants shut down so that we can develop a clean energy future. That's why we are working to stop Darlington in Ontario and protect electricity consumers from a new round of nuclear debt.

Energy [R]evolution

Greenpeace pressures the Canadian government and mobilizes citizens to demand action on climate change. We have developed a comprehensive Energy [R]evolution for Canada. The Energy [R]evolution outlines a clean energy future that challenges the current destructive energy scenario. Join Canada's Energy [R]evolution and support renewable energy to fight climate change.

The latest updates

 
Democracy, Dutch disease, and the tar sands

Democracy, Dutch disease, and the tar sands

Blog entry by Keith Stewart | June 1, 2012

Why is NDP leader Thomas Mulcair being denounced so vehemently for talking about Dutch disease? The term simply describes the effects of a resource boom. And there is no real debate as to whether or not the tar sands boom has driven...

People power vs Enbridge’s multi-million dollar pipeline PR campaign

People power vs Enbridge’s multi-million dollar pipeline PR campaign

Blog entry by Melina Laboucan-Massimo | May 30, 2012

Greenpeace may not have their $5 million to spend on ads, but we stole Enbridge’s spotlight yesterday.   Enbridge, which is trying to build a new tar sands pipeline across the Rockies and through the Great Bear rainforest,...

Greenpeace campaign against pipeline has wind in its sails

Greenpeace campaign against pipeline has wind in its sails

Feature story | May 29, 2012 at 11:30

Two Greenpeace activists rappelled off Vancouver's iconic Lions Gate Bridge with a 12 by 35 metre “save our coast, no tar sands pipelines” banner this morning, as Western premiers meet in Edmonton to discuss tar sands. The activists hang above...

Musqueam First Nation, 26 days and counting

Musqueam First Nation, 26 days and counting

Blog entry by Stephanie Goodwin | May 28, 2012 1 comment

The Musqueam First Nation have maintained a 24-hour watch over the Marpole Midden village site for the past 26 days to stop further excavation and removal of ancestral remains.  Greenpeace has been down to the Vancouver condo...

Greenpeace bites into Apple’s use of coal

Greenpeace bites into Apple’s use of coal

Blog entry by Mary Ambrose | May 16, 2012

Greenpeace’s effort to persuade Apple to replace their coal-powered data centres with renewable energy went global yesterday. It started with a projection on the glass front building which included messages from Apple clients around...

31 - 35 of 164 results.

Topics
Tags