All articles
-
Greenpeace heads to Supreme Court to defend polluter pay principle
Oil company polluters, not taxpayers and farmers, should bear responsibility for cleaning up the leftover toxic sites oil companies leave behind.
-
In the Pipeline: Risks for Funders of Tar Sands Pipelines
This report is written for banks, their institutional shareholders, and for those financial institutions considering financing or arranging finance – through the purchase or underwriting of corporate bonds or shares – the construction and operation of any of the proposed tar sands pipelines.
-
Canadian Securities Administrators’ risk disclosure review: Greenpeace Canada’s submission
Greenpeace Canada submits that, as the risks of climate change are material to the market price or value of securities, disclosure of climate risks should be mandatory.
-
How the Federal Parties Rate on Climate
Short Version: What You Need to Know Conservatives: The Conservatives are at least clear: they don’t even pretend to care about climate change or that they will really do anything about…
-
TransCanada vastly exaggerating Energy East’s ability to reduce overseas oil imports
By repeating false information, TransCanada is misleading Canadians and investors in a desperate attempt to justify its Energy East pipeline and tanker proposal.
-
So Glad You Asked 2: Greenpeace response to some well worn questions.
We generally get the same straw man arguments over and over again so over the next little while I wanted to take some time to answer them. The first “Answering the Critics”…
-
The Rainbow Spill: A Case of Crime and (No) Punishment
The 2011 Rainbow pipeline spill near the Lubicon Cree community of Little Buffalo was one of the largest in Alberta’s history.