Brussels/Manaus, Brazil– A Greenpeace investigation has exposed widespread fraud in the Brazilian forestry sector, which may have allowed massive quantities of illegal timber to reach the EU. Under the EU timber regulation, importers are obliged to take action to prevent illegal timber from entering the supply chain [1].


Greenpeace investigates in Pará state, Brazil

Much of this wood comes from Pará state in the Brazilian Amazon, which is one of the largest producers and exporters of tropical timber in Brazil, and where experts estimate that more than three-quarters of all logging is illegal [2]. The investigation by Greenpeace Brazil, Imaginary trees, real destruction, reveals a system that allows the laundering of illegally harvested timber with legal paperwork.

Greenpeace EU forest policy director Sébastien Risso said:Logging in the Brazilian Amazon is out of control. It’s practically impossible to guarantee that timber from the region comes from legal operations. National authorities in the EU should review the evidence and take urgent action to stop the sale of timber that does not meet the standards required by EU law. The European Commission should see that enforcement at national level is swift and effective”.

Loggers particularly target ipe trees, whose high value [3] makes it profitable to penetrate deep into the Amazon rainforest, causing major environmental damage and an intensification of violence against local communities [4].

The Greenpeace investigation exposes fraudulent forest inventories. Inventories are required in the Brazilian licensing process for forest management plans. The documents frequently overestimate the volumes of valuable trees, misidentify undesirable trees as commercially valuable species, or simply list non-occurring specimens [5]. Once forest management plans are approved, state agencies issue credits for the harvesting of this non-existent timber. These credits can then be used to cook the books of sawmills that process illegally logged trees from forests on indigenous lands, protected areas or public lands. Once laundered in this manner, illegal timber becomes indistinguishable from timber that has been harvested legally [6].

The investigation found that 11 EU countries imported 9,775m³ of ipe timber from forest management plans with indications of fraud between March 2016 and September 2017. France imported the largest amount (3,002m³), followed by Portugal (1,862m³), Belgium (1,754m³) and the Netherlands (1,549m³).

Despite several earlier Greenpeace investigations exposing deficiencies in Brazil’s control system and the inadequacy of official documentation as a guarantee of the legal origin of Brazilian Amazon timber, [6]  many operators in Europe continue to import ipe wood from the region. It is unclear what kind of measures they are taking to mitigate the risks of illegality inherent in the timber. Companies in Europe should stop buying timber from the Brazilian Amazon unless they can provide credible independent evidence that the timber is legal, beyond the simple presentation of official documents.

Notes:

[1] The EU timber regulation bans illegal timber in the EU. It obliges companies to conduct due diligence to ensure there is no more than a negligible risk that timber has been illegally harvested.

[2] Imazon (2013), Forest Management Transparency Report – State of Pará (2011 to 2012): http://imazon.org.br/publicacoes/forest-management-transparency-report-state-of-para-2011-to-2012/?lang=en

[3] Once processed into flooring or decking, ipe timber can fetch up to €2,000 per cubic meter at export ports.

[4] Greenpeace Brazil’s report, Blood-stained timber: rural violence and the theft of Amazon timber, shows how illegal logging in the Amazon is one of the main engines of violence in the region.

[5] The investigation is based on an analysis of 586 logging authorisations (derived from forest management plans) issued by the Department of the Environment of Pará state between 2013 and 2017, and field research conducted in the southwest of the state. The density of ipe trees was compared to scientific papers and to forestry inventories used in concessions in Pará state. The investigation showed that 77 per cent of those inventories registered volumes of ipe trees above the levels identified by recent research. In some cases, this ‘super filling’ of trees led to inventories with ten times more trees than what science says is likely.

[6] See visual on page 6 of the Greenpeace investigation.

[7] See Greenpeace Brazil reports: The Amazon’s Silent Crisis (May 2014), The Amazon’s Silent Crisis: Night Terrors (October 2014), The Amazon’s Silent Crisis: Licence to Launder (June 2015) and The Amazon’s Silent Crisis: Partners in Crime (November 2015).

 

Contacts:

Sébastien Risso – Greenpeace EU forest policy director: +32 (0)496 127009, sebastien.risso@greenpeace.org

Greenpeace EU press desk: +32 (0)2 274 1911, pressdesk.eu@greenpeace.org

 

For breaking news and comment on EU affairs: www.twitter.com/GreenpeaceEU

Greenpeace is an independent global campaigning network that acts to change attitudes and behaviour, to protect and conserve the environment and to promote peace. Greenpeace does not accept donations from governments, the EU, businesses or political parties.