30 November: Yesterday evening four environmental and human rights organisations* – supported by environmental law firm, Cullinan & Associates – filed an urgent interim-interim interdict against Shell in the Eastern Cape Division of the Grahamstown High Court to prevent the fossil fuel company from commencing seismic testing along the ecologically diverse and sensitive marine environment of South Africa’s Wild Coast. The testing was due to start tomorrow, 1 December 2021.
Confirmation of the filing
Cullinan & Associates delivered a certificate of urgency to the Registrar yesterday at approximately 12h45, 29 November. Acting Judge Govindjee’s Directive was received at around 14h20, which saw the matter as urgent, and determined the following in relation to interim-interim interdict:
- Applicants to issue and file papers yesterday, 29 November
- Respondents who intend to oppose are to deliver notice of opposition and answering affidavit by 16h00 today, 30 November
- Applicants to deliver replying affidavit, if any, by 13h00 tomorrow, 1 December
- Applicants and (opposing) Respondents to file heads by 13h00 tomorrow, 1 December.
The papers were filed at the High Court of South Africa, Eastern Cape Division, Grahamstown, and served electronically on Shell’s attorneys yesterday on 29 November 2021. The matter will be heard in Grahamstown and argued virtually at 14h00 tomorrow, 1 December 2021.
*The applicants are: Border Deep Sea Angling Association, Kei Mouth Ski Boat Club, Natural Justice and Greenpeace Africa.
Summary of grounds
Our view is that the commencement of the seismic exploration activities are prima facie unlawful until Shell has applied for, and obtained, the necessary Environmental Authorisation in terms of the National Environmental Management Act (NEMA).
We also believe that the decision-making process amounts to unjust administrative action since interested and affected parties were not informed of the granting of the exploration right or given an opportunity to appeal it. The public were also not notified of the two applications to renew the exploration right.
Potential impacts
The vessel would, for five months, fire air guns every 10 seconds through 6,011km² of ocean surface, firing extremely loud shock wave emissions that penetrate through 3km of water and 40km into the Earth’s crust below the seabed. Marine life on the sensitive Wild Coast would be disturbed and destroyed with many sea creatures like whales, dolphins, seals, penguins, sharks and even crabs and tiny shellfish being negatively impacted by the blasts in the coming months. The Wild Coast’s pristine beaches and biodiversity attract millions of tourists every year. Seismic surveys have been linked to decreased sightings of marine life and decreased catch rates for commercial fishing.
The planned seismic survey, and planned activity thereafter will have direct and dire impacts on the social, economic and cultural rights, and ultimately the right to self determination of the communities of eXolobeni, Nqamakwe and Port Saint Johns, which depend heavily on eco-tourism and fishing for livelihoods and subsistence, and who safeguard this land as sacred and deeply connected to their identity and heritage. The needs and rights of these communities, the stewards of our seas, land and biodiversity, far outweigh the selfish interests of companies like Shell.
The mitigation measures proposed by Shell are wholly inadequate for South Africa’s most diverse coastline and will cause irreparable harm to whales, dolphins, crayfish, endemic reef fish, fish larvae, turtles, birdlife and zooplankton. Many listed as Threatened and Protected Species are located directly within the survey area. Shell’s own documents state that the surveys should not take place in December due to migratory whales (now in calf) traversing the area.
The applicants intend putting expert evidence before the court to expose how irrational and socially unjust it is for Shell to continue looking for more oil and gas reserves when the reserves already discovered cannot be used without causing catastrophic climate change, especially in light of the Dutch court ruling ordering Shell to reduce its greenhouse gas emissions by 47% within this decade.
Comments from applicants:
“This flies in the face of the government’s responsibility to protect and safeguard human rights and the environment. It also undermines our government’s obligation under the Paris Climate Agreement to mitigate the climate crisis for people now, and for future generations, and contradicts the commitments made at the recent COP26 in Glasgow to lower emissions and advance a just transition.” – Pooven Moodley, NJ Executive Director.
“It’s ludicrous that this is even being considered as an option by our government to look for gas and oil reserves in an evolving ‘greener’ world in any of our coastal waters, let alone the extremely biodiverse and sensitive Wild Coast. We will not take this lying down and will do all in our power to put a stop to it.” – John Luef, Border Deep Sea Angling Association.
“Shell’s activities threaten to destroy the Wild Coast and the lives of the people living there. We know that Shell is a climate criminal, destroying people’s lives and the planet for profit. South Africa’s problems do not require violent extraction nor destruction of the environment and community livelihoods. The best and most immediate solution is a just transition to renewable energy, ensuring safe and decent/work jobs, and energy access for all.” – Happy Khambule, Senior Climate and Energy Campaign Manager for Greenpeace Africa.
Ends.
Notes to the editor
- This is an update and follow up to the PR sent out by Natural Justice on 26th November 2021: Shell’s seismic survey: If we have to go to court, we will
- Please see the above PR for comments and quotes from impacted communities.
- Find attached relevant documents for reference and downloading.
- To date, neither NJ nor Cullinan & Associates have received responses to the following letters sent:
On 18 November to the Ministry of Mineral Resources and Energy, querying the renewal of an exploration right granted to Impact Africa LTD and Shell PLC, without prior notice, public participation, nor consultation with impacted communities.
On 23 November from Cullinan & Associates on behalf of Natural Justice, the Kei Mouth Ski Boat Club and the Border Deep Sea Angling Association, sent to the Ministries of Mineral Resources and Energy; and Forestry, Fisheries and the Environment requesting that Barbara Creecy issue a coastal protection notice, and Gwede Mantashe suspend seismic activity and exploration by Shell and Impact Africa, due to commence 1 December.
For media inquiries, please contact:
Katherine Robinson,
Natural Justice [email protected]
+27 762 276 517
Annette Gibbs,
Cullinan & Associates, [email protected]
+27 824 671 295
Chris Vlavianos,
Greenpeace Africa [email protected]
+27 798 837 036
On the 1st of December, Royal Dutch Shell will start an oil and gas exploration project in the Wild Coast.
Get Involved
Discussion
Africa is not a dumping ground. Dump your rubbish and plastic in your own country, the USA. Thank you.
Thank you for your support.
I do not support the distruction of our marine life that Shell want to impart on my home which is the wild voast or coastal life of South Africa thus sn immediate stop to this process must be implemented
Thank you for sharing with us. Kindly take action here>>> https://act.gp/3D7IjF6