-
Greenpeace International calls on North Dakota court to reject Energy Transfer’s attempt to avoid accountability under EU law
Greenpeace International met Energy Transfer in a hearing to address the company’s request for an anti-suit injunction protecting it from accountability under Dutch and European Union law.
-
Court attacks and defunding NGOs: a growing pattern of silencing protest in Europe
Speaking up against the actions of the rich and powerful, or openly resisting them, has always come with dangers, as Greenpeace well knows.
-
You can’t sink a rainbow and you can’t silence hope
40 years since the bombing of the Rainbow Warrior.
-
Greenpeace International begins groundbreaking Anti-SLAPP case to protect freedom of speech
In a first, landmark test case of the EU's new legislation to protect freedom of expression and stop abusive lawsuits, Greenpeace International challenges the US oil pipeline company, Energy Transfer, in court in the Netherlands.
-
A landmark test case to stop bullying lawsuits
Greenpeace International faces Energy Transfer in a test case under the EU’s new anti-SLAPP law, aiming to stop corporate bullying and defend free speech.
-
Still no evidence and still no final judgment in Energy Transfer lawsuit
Greenpeace defendants met Energy Transfer plaintiffs in a post-trial hearing in North Dakota state court.
-
Greenpeace organisations challenge perverse damages in Energy Transfer lawsuit
In the first hearing since the trial concluded in Energy Transfer’s bullying lawsuit against Greenpeace International and Greenpeace in the US, the defendants argued to reduce the more than USD$660 million damages awarded to Energy Transfer.
-
Greenpeace vs. Energy Transfer’s SLAPP: What happens after the North Dakota trial?
An interview with Greenpeace International General Counsel Kristin Casper
-
From bombs to SLAPPS: We will not be silenced
Being SLAPPed in the face with a liability of more than US$660 million for something we so clearly did not do is not for the faint of heart. But we…