To keep FSC certification as a credible tool to help protect forests, Greenpeace International is publishing a series of case studies exposing controversial operations that are posing the greatest risk to the FSC’s integrity. We will also be highlighting best practice operations that are meeting and/or exceeding the FSC’s principles and criteria. These case studies will show the standards that must be consistently met if the FSC is to maintain its credibility.
FSC at Risk: Resolute Controlled Wood
This case study describes an FSC chain-of-custody (CoC) certificate – held by Resolute Forest Products – that isn't consistent with FSC's CoC standard for sourcing controlled wood, and presents a liability to the FSC reputation and brand. The case study shows how the company is using "controlled wood" that does not respect key FSC principles related to the maintenance of HCVs and the rights of indigenous peoples.
Update: Greenpeace updated this FSC case study on 11th October 2013 to reflect new information regarding the number of facilities in Resolute's chain of custody.
Download FSC Case Study 03: Resolute Controlled Wood
FSC at Work: Ecotrust Canada
This case study is an example of how FSC certification has successfully led to a substantial improvement in forest management practices from the status quo. It profiles how the forest management group, Ecotrust Canada, respects and in places even exceeds key FSC’s Principles and Criteria, thereby maintaining the forests’ ecological and social values.
Download FSC Case Study 02: Ecotrust Canada
FSC at Risk: Finland
This case study describes how FSC chain-of-custody (CoC) certificates – held by Finland’s three largest pulp and paper producers UPM, Stora Enso and Metsä Group – do not comply with FSC’s CoC standard for sourcing controlled wood, and therefore present a liability to the FSC reputation and brand. These companies are sourcing “controlled wood” in contravention of requirements for the maintenance of high conversation values.
Greenpeace updated this FSC case study on 29 August 2013. References to the Swiss Association for Quality and Management Services (SQS) on pages 4 and 9 have been removed following confirmation from SQS that it was not responsible for verifying any FSC certificates mentioned in the case study.
Download FSC Case Study 01: Finland
FSC at Risk: Progress Report
Greenpeace believes that, if all FSC supporters work together, we can resolve the shortcomings the system currently faces, and preserve the credibility and legitimacy of FSC.
Download the Progress Report.
What is the FSC?
Click here to learn more about the FSC and why Greenpeace supports it as the leading standard for responsible forest management and wood products certification.