Manage your cookies preferences

Please select which cookies you are willing to store.

Necessary Cookies (required) Always enabled

These cookies are required for technical reasons so that you can visit our website and use the functions we offer. These cookies are used to recognise you between successive visits and thus provide you with a better experience, storing your consent preferences and the last Greenpeace.org website visited.

We use tracking and analysis tools to ensure continuous optimisation and demand-oriented design of our website. These cookies will allow us to collect statistical and anonymised data, such as how visitors use our website or which pages are accessed most frequently, to ultimately improve Greenpeace.org and provide you with a better experience of our website.

In addition to the Performance cookies mentioned above, we may also place in your browser cookies from third-party services (e.g. Facebook or Google) to track the effectiveness of our online marketing strategies and to deliver adverts more relevant to you and your interests. These cookies may also be used to serve advertising to you after you have left our site (retargeting cookies).

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By clicking "Accept all cookies" you agree to our Privacy & Cookies Policy. You can change your cookies settings anytime.

Legal Documents

Energy Transfer’s SLAPP lawsuits

Since 2017, Greenpeace International and Greenpeace entities in the US have been defending themselves against back-to-back, meritless SLAPP lawsuits filed by Energy Transfer. Here is a selection of key court documents that have been made available to the public.

Free Speech Message Delivered to Energy Transfer in Dallas. © Laura Buckman / Greenpeace

The meritless lawsuits filed by Energy Transfer (ET) against Greenpeace International and Greenpeace entities in the US since 2017 are clear-cut examples of SLAPPs (Strategic Lawsuits Against Public Participation). Like all SLAPPs, ET’s lawsuits are an attempt to bury nonprofits and activists in legal fees, threaten them with bankruptcy and ultimately silence dissent.

On March 19, a Morton County jury of nine reached a verdict in Energy Transfer’s SLAPP against Greenpeace entities in the US (Greenpeace Inc, Greenpeace Fund), and Greenpeace International, finding the entities liable for more than US$660 million. But this fight is far from over: the legal battle continues in the US and in the Netherlands. 

In February 2025, Greenpeace International, based in the Netherlands, initiated the first test of the European Union’s anti-SLAPP Directive by filing a lawsuit in Dutch court against ET seeking to recover all damages and costs it has suffered as a result of ET’s lawsuits.

North Dakota State Supreme Court

District Court Orders

Documents filed by Energy Transfer and other Plaintiffs

Documents filed by Greenpeace International and/or The Greenpeace Defendants

Documents filed by Third Parties