All articles
-
The ‘Chernobyl’ mini-series has finished, but the real life catastrophe never ends
For many of us, the Chornobyl catastrophe is not history. The disaster itself continues, and its effects can still be felt today.
-
Japanese government misleading UN on impact of Fukushima fallout on children, decontamination workers
Tokyo, Japan - The Japanese government is deliberately misleading United Nations human rights bodies and experts over the ongoing nuclear crisis in areas of Fukushima.
-
Technical failures increase risk of contaminated Fukushima water discharge into Pacific – Greenpeace
"The decision not to develop water processing technology...was motivated by short term cost cutting not protection of the Pacific ocean environment or the health and livelihoods of communities.."
-
Five reasons to support a total ban of nuclear weapons today
Let’s keep up the pressure on governments to put an end to nuclear proliferation and to strengthen international security. Together, we can show that we want a safer world.
-
Floating nuclear power plant reaches the Arctic, Greenpeace demands strict safety controls
“The barge will be fuelled and tested near a city of 300,000 people, then towed with two reactors full of irradiated fuel along the Northern Sea Route. "
-
The Business of War: how weapons manufactured in Europe help inflict harm in the rest of the world
The world spends an estimated $1.7 trillion a year on war. Just to compare: global humanitarian funding is 1.3% of that. According to the the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute…
-
Greenpeace escort protests world’s first purpose-built floating nuclear power plant
”This power plant basically moves the threat of a nuclear catastrophe into fragile Arctic waters."
-
5 reasons why a floating nuclear power plant in the Arctic is a terrible idea
The world's first purpose-built floating nuclear power plant is now bound for the Arctic. Here's why that is a terrible idea.
-
World’s first floating nuclear power plant bound for the Arctic, warns Greenpeace
“This hazardous venture is not just a threat to the Arctic, but, potentially, to other densely populated or vulnerable natural regions too”
-
32 years after Chornobyl, next up, a Chornobyl on ice?
A nuclear power plant afloat in Arctic waters to power machines to dig up more climate-harming fossil fuels? What are they thinking?