All articles
-
What today’s judgment means for Greenpeace USA
A final judgment has officially been entered in Big Oil company Energy Transfer’s massive lawsuit against us.
-
Greenpeace organizations to appeal US $345 million North Dakota court judgment in Energy Transfer’s intimidation lawsuit
Mandan, North Dakota (February 27,2026) — Greenpeace organizations in the U.S. and Greenpeace International announce they will seek a new trial and, if necessary, appeal the decision with the North…
-
Energy Transfer racked up $100 million in fines; faced criminal charges for environmental abuses while suing to silence critics
A damning new report from Greenpeace USA exposes a years-long pattern of environmental destruction, safety violations, and corporate impunity by Big Oil company Energy Transfer.
-
Bad Neighbor: Energy Transfer’s Pattern of Pollution and Violations
Exposing Energy Transfer’s record of pollution, safety violations, and harming communities.
-
North Dakota court will not block Greenpeace International from using European anti-SLAPP laws against Energy Transfer
MANDAN, N.D. (September 10, 2025) – In response to North Dakota District Court Judge James Gion rejecting Energy Transfer’s request for an anti-suit injunction in Greenpeace International’s landmark anti-intimidation lawsuit,…
-
Energy Transfer vs. Greenpeace trial analysis
Here is what you need to know about the Energy Transfer vs. Greenpeace trial.
-
Energy Transfer lawsuit: still no evidence, still no final judgment
Greenpeace defendants again met Energy Transfer in a post-trial hearing in North Dakota.
-
Greenpeace organizations challenge perverse damages in Energy Transfer lawsuit
In the first hearing since the trial concluded in Energy Transfer’s bullying lawsuit against Greenpeace Inc., Greenpeace Fund, and Greenpeace International, the defendants argued to reduce the more than $660 million damages awarded to Energy Transfer.
-
Greenpeace USA responds to Energy Transfer Q1 earnings call announcement
In response to Energy Transfer announcing $4.1B in 2025 Q1 profits, Sushma Raman, Greenpeace USA Interim Executive Director, issued the following statement:
-
Op-Ed: The North Dakota ruling against Greenpeace is a threat to free speech
In an op-ed published in The Guardian, Greenpeace Inc. and Greenpeace Fund Interim Executive Director Sushma Raman alongside ACLU executive director Anthony Romero discuss how the recent $660m judgment against Greenpeace USA poses a serious threat to free speech and protest rights.