All articles
-
North Dakota court will not block Greenpeace International from using European anti-SLAPP laws against Energy Transfer
MANDAN, N.D. (September 10, 2025) – In response to North Dakota District Court Judge James Gion rejecting Energy Transfer’s request for an anti-suit injunction in Greenpeace International’s landmark anti-intimidation lawsuit,…
-
Energy Transfer vs. Greenpeace trial analysis
Here is what you need to know about the Energy Transfer vs. Greenpeace trial.
-
Energy Transfer lawsuit: still no evidence, still no final judgment
Greenpeace defendants again met Energy Transfer in a post-trial hearing in North Dakota.
-
Greenpeace organizations challenge perverse damages in Energy Transfer lawsuit
In the first hearing since the trial concluded in Energy Transfer’s bullying lawsuit against Greenpeace Inc., Greenpeace Fund, and Greenpeace International, the defendants argued to reduce the more than $660 million damages awarded to Energy Transfer.
-
Greenpeace USA responds to Energy Transfer Q1 earnings call announcement
In response to Energy Transfer announcing $4.1B in 2025 Q1 profits, Sushma Raman, Greenpeace USA Interim Executive Director, issued the following statement:
-
Op-Ed: The North Dakota ruling against Greenpeace is a threat to free speech
In an op-ed published in The Guardian, Greenpeace Inc. and Greenpeace Fund Interim Executive Director Sushma Raman alongside ACLU executive director Anthony Romero discuss how the recent $660m judgment against Greenpeace USA poses a serious threat to free speech and protest rights.
-
Energy Transfer lawsuit verdict
The jury has officially reached a verdict in our trial against Big Oil company Energy Transfer’s meritless lawsuit. We’re going to appeal.
-
Jury delivers verdict finding Greenpeace entities liable for more than $660 million in Energy Transfer SLAPP trial
A Morton County jury of nine reached a verdict in Energy Transfer’s meritless lawsuit against Greenpeace entities in the US (Greenpeace Inc, Greenpeace Fund), and Greenpeace International, finding the entities liable for more than US$660 million, today.
-
North Dakota Supreme Court denies Greenpeace entities’ petition for venue change in Energy Transfer SLAPP trial
The North Dakota Supreme Court today denied a petition by Greenpeace organizations in the US and Greenpeace International for a change of venue as they defend against the SLAPP case brought by Energy Transfer in Morton County.
-
Greenpeace organizations go to trial on high-stakes SLAPP lawsuit that could redefine protest rights
North Dakota is set to become the battleground for one of the most consequential free speech cases in recent history. Energy Transfer, the Big Oil corporation behind the Dakota Access Pipeline, is seeking $300 million in damages from Greenpeace USA and Greenpeace International, accusing these organizations of playing a central role in organizing the Indigenous-led…