Greenpeaces take on the movie Promised Land: the truth about fracking is worse than fiction

by Jesse Coleman

January 8, 2013

The film Promised Land, directed by Gus Van Sant, deals with exploitation of ruralAmericaby oil and gas corporations, made possible by the process of fracking. Fracking has become a highly controversial topic in the last few years, due to both its unchecked and unregulated expansion, and because of the environmental destruction this expansion has brought with it. The film in turn has attracted its own controversy, enduring full throated attacks from the oil and gas industryand their shills. So, how accurate is the film? To start, Promised Land does a good job representing the way powerful oil corporations move through towns leasing up land.As the film depicts, they use landmen, people who are trained to knock on doors and get the best possible leasing deals from land owners. Best possible in the case of the landmen means lots of land at a low price, since the fracking companies pay bonuses to the landmen that close the most leases with the lowest payout. These landmen therefore have a vested interest in downplaying any possible negative effects of fracking,which they do. Many landowners sign leases having no idea what the process of fracking will entail, and are shocked when thousands of trucks, heavy industrial machinery and tons of chemicals set up shop next to their house. Gas Flare in Bradford County However, Promised Land does not give a very coherent explanation of what fracking is and the dangers inherent to the process.The cost of fracking includes, but is certainly not limited to the poisoning of groundwater, which is the main focus in the film.Chemical spills, 24/7 truck traffic, leaks of hazardous gas, and the creation of millions of gallons of toxic fluid are also inherent to fracking, and the film never really explains that.Not to mention the inevitable escape of methane, an extremely potent greenhouse gas. For a detailed description of fracking, see Greenpeacesfracking page. As for the big plot twist in film, Ill try not to spoil it But I will say that while the twist seems unbelievable, fracking corporations have actually done some mind-boggling things to rural communities that oppose them. The fracking corporationRange Resourceswas caught on tape bragging about hiring ex-soldiers touse psychological warfaretechniques on Pennsylvanians that oppose drilling. Multiple corporations are actively suing small towns that have attempted to vote on whether or not to allow fracking in their neighborhoods. The truth is, oil and gas companies are capable of being much more villainous than the fictional shenanigans at the end of this film would suggest.
Jesse Coleman

By Jesse Coleman

Jesse Coleman is a researcher with the Greenpeace Investigations team. His focus is on front groups, fracking, and the oil and gas industry. Jesse's work has been featured in The Guardian, The New York Times, The Colbert Report, Al-Jazeera, MSNBC, and NPR.

We Need Your Voice. Join Us!

Standard text messaging rates will apply. Greenpeace US may contact you by email or phone with campaign updates and other offers of engagement. You can unsubscribe at any time.

Want to learn more about tax-deductible giving, donating stock and estate planning?

Visit Greenpeace Fund, a nonprofit, 501(c)(3) charitable entity created to increase public awareness and understanding of environmental issues through research, the media and educational programs.