3 reasons a Republican Congress could herald important action on climate
by Brian Johnson
January 6, 2015
© Shayne Robinson / Greenpeace
Its here. The day the newly elected, Republican-dominated Congress takes office. The shift understandably has many folks concerned about the future of our climate. After all, Republicans dont exactly have a strong reputation for supporting climate policy.
Still, dont put aside all hopes for climate action in the next two years. Here are three reasons a Republican congress could oversee progress.
Reason #1: Theres still a lot President Obama can do without Congress.
Prime on this list is the EPAs proposed rule on existing power plants. Released by the Obama administration this past June, the regulation would require all power plants to reduce their carbon emissions up to 15% from todays levels by 2030.
EPA will still need to finalize the plan, and the rules carbon reduction goal is roughly a quarter of what Greenpeace analysis shows is possible. But with 40% of U.S. carbon emissions coming from power plants, the rule is still a pollution cut worth makingand one that doesnt require a vote by Congress.
The Obama administration also holds big keys to the climate through its federal land leasing program. Leasing of federal land is a major lifeline to the struggling coal mining industry, which depends on scandalously cheap leases from the Department of Interior. Interior agencies also handle oil leases of Arctic seabeds off the coast of Alaska, a deal that Shell has tried (and failed) to cash in on.
Stopping such leases would not only avert billions of tons of eventual carbon pollution (more than the entire European Union), but directly protect the health of people and ecosystems.
Reason #2: All sorts of important things are happening on climate change outside the federal government.
Starting with state and local governments. California Governor Jerry Brown just declared that his state, the nations most populous, should get half its power from renewables by 2030. On the local level, New York mayor Bill de Blasio recently vowed to cut his citys climate change emissions 80% by 2050.
Then theres the private sector, where the plummeting cost of solar panels, along with new financing models, have fueled an explosion in rooftop solar installations. Analysts project that prices for rooftop solar will either equal or dip below the average electricity bill in 47 states by 2016. The Department of Energy predicts that 4 million homes could have rooftop solar by 2020.
Finally, even conservatives are bypassing the Republican party on climate. In Georgia, Florida and Wisconsin, Tea Party activists are lobbying for greater access to distributed electricity like rooftop solar because, dammit, its a free market, and who made monopoly utilities king?
A rooftop solar installation under the “Solarize Charlotte”program.
Reason #3: If there ever was a time for Republicans to change their tune on climate, its now.
Climate denialism has been a checklist item for Republicans, from challenging the idea that human pollution is the main cause, to the even lamer deflection, I am not a scientist.
But after dominating their elections this fall, some Republicans may feel they finally have the political leash to say what they may have been thinking all along: that climate change is real, and were responsible.
Look to moderate Republicans in purple and blue states to possibly reel back their denialism, says Greenpeace Senior Legislative Analyst Kyle Ash. A climate disaster such as a flood or an unusual hurricane in a Republicans home state, Ash adds, could also make climate denialism an unattractive claim.
That may not translate into a comprehensive bill on climate change this Congress, but could set the stage for a big bill in another. The House version of the 2009 climate bill only passed by 7 votes. The bill was flawed, and died in the Senate. But if the political balance on climate was ever tippable, it might be now, in this Republican Congress.