Tell U.S. Ex-Im Bank: Don’t Use Tax Payer Dollars to Destroy the Great Barrier Reef

by Guest Blogger

August 9, 2012

— co-written by Mary Anne Hitt, Director of the Sierra ClubBeyond Coal Campaign, and Justin Guay, Sierra Club’sInternational Program.

The U.S. Export-Import Bank (Ex-Im Bank) and its chairman, Fred Hochberg, are facing a big decision about a coal project in one of the world’s most treasured places. Disturbing reports are emerging that the bank is consideringfinancing a massive coal project in Australiawith taxpayer money that would include an export terminalinside theGreat Barrier Reef.

We need your help to put the brakes on this project now. This is only the latest in a string of coal projects supported by Ex-Im Bank that are harming communities and the environment in South Africa,India, and even herein Appalachia.

The project’s backers, India-based GVK and Australia-based Hancock Coal, are telling various media outlets that Ex-Im is prepared to finance equipment for their massive Alpha minein Australia’s Galilee Basin. The Galilee Basin is ground zero for Australia’s push to triple coal exports, a move that would put Australia well ahead of Saudi Arabia for total carbon exports. The planned projects fromHancock Coal, including the Alpha mine, would not only flood the international market with nearly 8 billion tons of coal (double China’s current annual consumption) but also ravage one of the world’s unique natural treasures — the Great Barrier Reef.

It is this vast flow of dirty coal that caught the interest of GVK and prompted the Indian conglomerate tobuy a majority stake in Hancock. That’s because India is currentlyexperiencing a coal crisis,as the high price of coal on the international marketcauses projectsto go bankrupt or seek bailouts(like Tata Mundra).

But while the regional Queensland government was working to streamline approval for the Alpha Coal Project, UNESCO released a damning report that shows coal development is damaging the Great Barrier Reef. UNESCO then demanded that Australia take action to halt the project –or risk putting the reef’s World Heritage Sitestatus in jeopardy. Australia’s Federal Environment Minster reacted by suspending the Queensland government’s involvement in the project becausehe could not“trust them with the Great Barrier Reef.”

Of course, expanded ports are hardly the only risk that the Alpha mine poses to the Great Barrier Reef. Coal is one of the most carbon-intense fuels in the world, and if climate change continues unabated, the reefcould be destroyed by 2050.

Financing from the Ex-Im Bank could make or break this project. Unfortunately, the Bank does not consider downstream emissions when assessing the carbon risks of proposed projects. In other words, Ex-Im Bank would only count the carbon released at the mine and associated transport, despite the fact that coal is mined and transported for the sole purpose of burning at another location. But even if Ex-Im Bank did consider downstream emissions, the bank doesn’t care. It has already approved several of the world’smost carbon-intensive coal projects (in violation ofits own carbon policy).

There is some good news, though. While GVK has used the media to claim that Ex-Im Bank’s involvementis a done deal, the bank has not yet publicly associated itself with the project or committed to financing.

That leaves us a small window of opportunity to save the reef.We must act now to send Fred Hochberg and Ex-Im Bank a message that we will not stand by while they use our taxpayer dollars to help destroy the Great Barrier Reef.

Join us in tweeting:@fredhochbergyou must #savethereef and quit #GVK/Alpha #coal; Move@EximBankUS@BeyondCoal!

We Need Your Voice. Join Us!

Want to learn more about tax-deductible giving, donating stock and estate planning?

Visit Greenpeace Fund, a nonprofit, 501(c)(3) charitable entity created to increase public awareness and understanding of environmental issues through research, the media and educational programs.