June 18th, 2009 
4:15pm Tokyo
Yesterday during the 4th pre-trial hearing in the case of the Tokyo Two, Prof. Dirk Voorhoof defense counsel expert witness, submitted his legal opinion to the District Court of Aomori. It explained how under principles of the European Court of Human Rights, principles to which Japan has signed onto through the International Convenant of Civil and Political Rights, Junichi Sato and Toru Suzuki were justified in their tactics of exposing a whale meat embezzlement scandal. According to Voorhoof, precedence would show that as campaigners for an NGO, the T2 are protected in their pursuit and obligation to contribute to public debate and democratic society in Japan. However, whether Voorhoof’s opinion will be accepted as evidence into the actual trial for the T2 is yet to be seen. See the previous entry of this blog for a summary of the Prof. Voorhoof’s legal opinion or read the complete statement just submitted to court.
Latest Controversy
Prof. Voorhoof was well-received by media at a press briefing regarding his opinion and the human rights implications of the T2 case. Reporters were also interested in another new development. On Monday, before the latest pre-trial, at the request of the court, the prosecutor’s office disclosed parts of a written statement given by the crew of the whaling fleet implicated in the whale meat embezzlement scandal exposed by Junichi and Toru. However, the core part of the statement has been whited out. The judge must now decide whether to proceed in spite of the prosecution’s lack of disclosure.
Read about Greenpeace’s dossier of evidence exposing the scandal, a timeline of events, and more.
Looking Forward
from NGOs like Amnesty.
